Head & brain settlements
in Queensland.
Brain injury claims in Queensland stand or fall on proof. A plaintiff who said lead from the Mount Isa mine and smelter caused her brain damage when she was an infant lost in the Supreme Court in 2023: the court answered no on duty, breach and causation. A cyclist hit at Palm Beach in 2017 argued for a minor brain injury as his dominant injury, but the doctors agreed the MRI scans showed none, and his neck injury was valued instead.
Facts that decide a head & brain claim in Queensland
| Three things to prove | A claimant must prove a duty of care, a breach of it, and that the breach caused the injury; if any one is not proved, the claim fails.Sanders v Mount Isa Mines Limited [2023] QSC 188 |
|---|---|
| Imaging matters | Where the experts agreed the brain MRI showed no injury, the claimed brain injury was not accepted as the dominant injury.Cabato v Paltridge [2025] QDC 59 |
| How pain and suffering is valued | General damages are fixed by an Injury Scale Value from 0 to 100, using the injury ranges in Schedule 4 of the Civil Liability Regulation, then converted to dollars by an indexation notice.MAIC, What can be claimed |
| Time limit | The limitation period for injury claims is three years; a court can extend it under s 31 of the Limitation of Actions Act 1974 when a material fact of a decisive character was not known in time.Rodgers v Chinsee [2024] QDC 55 |