Skip to content
MyClaimWorth
★ glossary entry

Non-economic damages

By Reviewed by Abd Shanti, Founder7 min read
★ applies inUnited States
★ definition

A US term for compensation covering pain, suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, and emotional distress, losses without a fixed dollar value.

What it means in practice.

Several US states cap non-economic damages, particularly in medical malpractice (California MICRA, Texas, Florida). The rest of the world calls these general damages.

Non-economic damages pay for losses that have no receipt: pain, suffering, emotional distress, disfigurement and the loss of enjoyment of life. They sit beside economic damages, which cover things you can add up, such as medical bills and lost wages. In most US courts a jury puts a dollar figure on the non-economic part after hearing the medical evidence and how the injury changed the person’s daily life.

Many states limit these damages by statute, most often in medical malpractice cases and sometimes in all injury cases. The limits differ widely: some are fixed sums, some rise each year with inflation or wages, and some depend on life expectancy or on how severe the injury is. A few states have no cap at all. Where a cap and a fault reduction both apply, the order in which they are applied can change the result, which is why the worked example below matters.

Outside the United States the same idea goes by other names: general damages in England, Ireland and Australia, solatium in Scotland, and non-pecuniary damages in Canada.

How it works in different places.

WhereHow it worksSource
AlaskaThe greater of $400,000 or $8,000 times life expectancy in years; for severe permanent physical impairment or severe disfigurement, the greater of $1,000,000 or $25,000 times life expectancy.Alaska Stat. § 09.17.010
Alaska (health care)$250,000 against health care providers, or $400,000 for wrongful death or severe permanent impairment.Alaska Stat. § 09.55.549
Idaho$538,425.04 from July 1, 2026, adjusted each July with the state average weekly wage; not applied to willful or reckless misconduct or a felony.Idaho Code § 6-1603; Industrial Commission cap table
Montana (malpractice)$350,000 from January 1, 2026, rising $50,000 a year to $500,000 in 2029, then 2 percent a year.Mont. Code Ann. § 25-9-411
South Dakota (malpractice)Total general damages may not exceed $500,000; special damages such as medical bills are not limited.S.D. Codified Laws § 21-3-11
West Virginia (malpractice)$250,000 per occurrence, or $500,000 for death or the most serious injuries, adjusted for inflation but never above 150 percent of those figures.W. Va. Code § 55-7B-8

A worked example.

★ from a real decision

Fault first, then the cap: Kisling v. Grosz (Alaska 2025)

Jury’s noneconomic damages
$1,200,000
Defendant’s share of fault
25%
Fault applied first
$1,200,000 × 25% = $300,000
Alaska cap that applied
$400,000
Judgment for noneconomic loss
$300,000 (under the cap)

The defendant argued the cap should come first, which would have left $100,000 (25% of $400,000). The Alaska Supreme Court held that fault is applied to the verdict first and the cap afterwards.

Kisling v. Grosz, Alaska Supreme Court (2025)

Sources.

★ where it applies

On these country pages.

The country pages spell out the local statute, the named authority, and the bands that interact with this term.

★ frequently asked

Common questions.

Quick answers, plain English.

★ editorial note

This entry describes the term as it appears in published authority and practitioner usage. Nothing on this page is legal advice. For your specific case, consult a solicitor or attorney qualified in your jurisdiction. See /methodology for how we derive figures elsewhere on the site, /sources for the standing authority list, and /disclaimer for the scope statement.