Skip to content
MyClaimWorth
MI
★ Michigan · back & spine

Back & spine settlements
in Michigan.

By Reviewed by Abd Shanti, Founder9 min read

A Michigan back injury claim has two parts: no fault benefits from your own insurer, and a lawsuit against the at fault driver for pain and excess losses. A pedestrian with a herniated disc had her lawsuit dismissed and then revived on appeal.

Facts that decide a back & spine claim in Michigan

No fault thresholdPain and suffering after a car crash requires death, permanent serious disfigurement, or a serious impairment of body function: “an objectively manifested impairment of an important body function that affects the person’s general ability to lead his or her normal life.”MCL 500.3135(5), as quoted in Patrick v. Turkelson (Mich. Ct. App. 2018)
Excess economic lossA claim against the at fault driver can include economic losses beyond what no fault benefits pay, as well as noneconomic damages if the threshold is met.Johnson v. Recca (Mich. Ct. App. 2011)
Deadline to sue“3 years after the time of the death or injury for all actions to recover damages for the death of a person, or for injury to a person or property.”MCL 600.5805, as quoted in Henry v. Dow Chemical (Mich. Ct. App. 2017)
Fault ruleA plaintiff more than 50% at fault cannot recover noneconomic damages; economic damages are reduced by the plaintiff’s share.MCL 600.2959, as explained in Kandil-Elsayed v. F & E Oil (Mich. 2023)
★ MI · reported back & spine outcomes

What Michigan courts have awarded.

Real Michigan decisions and verdicts, each linked to the court record or official report.

  • Michigan Court of Appeals · 2011
    Summary disposition reversed

    A pedestrian was hit by a car in 2004 and knocked backwards. She claimed injuries to her lumbar, thoracic and cervical spine, including a herniated disc at L5-S1, and a traumatic brain injury that aggravated a seizure disorder. The trial court dismissed her claims against the driver for economic and noneconomic damages; the Court of Appeals reversed and sent the case back.

★ MI · back & spine · in practice

What changes the number here.

What actually moves a back & spine settlement in Michigan.

  1. 1

    Keep the two claims straight. First party no fault benefits come from your insurer; the third party claim against the driver covers pain and suffering and losses no fault does not pay.

  2. 2

    Disc injuries often meet the threshold. A herniation seen on imaging is an objectively manifested impairment; the question is how it affects your normal life.

  3. 3

    Rulings in one claim can affect the other. In Recca the benefits case and the third party case ran on separate tracks, and a ruling in one shaped the other.

★ MI · statute of limitations
3 years from date of injury

Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5805

★ MI · fault rule
Modified comparative, 51% bar

Modified comparative, recovery barred at 51% claimant fault.

★ MI · caps

What caps recovery.

Statutory caps that may bear on a back & spine settlement in Michigan.

★ back & spine · same region & fault regime

Compare to like jurisdictions.

How Michigan's fault rule and limitation period compare to jurisdictions in the same US region and to those running the same fault rule for back & spine claims.

JurisdictionFault ruleLimitationBack & spine page
Michigan · you are hereModified comparative, 51% bar3 years from date of injury—
MinnesotaModified comparative, 51% bar6 years for personal injury (uncommonly long); 4 years for medical malpracticeMN · back & spine →
MissouriPure comparative negligence5 years for personal injury; 2 years for medical malpracticeMO · back & spine →
NebraskaModified comparative, 50% bar4 years for personal injury; 2 years for medical malpracticeNE · back & spine →
North DakotaModified comparative, 50% bar6 years for personal injury; 2 years for medical malpracticeND · back & spine →
OhioModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injuryOH · back & spine →
South DakotaSlight versus gross negligence3 years from date of injurySD · back & spine →
MontanaModified comparative, 51% bar3 years from date of injuryMT · back & spine →
NevadaModified comparative, 51% bar2 years for personal injury; 3 years for medical malpracticeNV · back & spine →
New HampshireModified comparative, 51% bar3 years from date of injuryNH · back & spine →
New JerseyModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injuryNJ · back & spine →
MississippiPure comparative negligence3 years from date of injuryMS · back & spine →
New MexicoPure comparative negligence3 years from date of injuryNM · back & spine →
★ MI · back & spine · frequently asked

Common questions.

Each answer is independently coherent and references the relevant statute or authority document.

★ editorial note

Figures on this page are not quotes for any specific case. For representation, consult an attorney admitted in Michigan. See /methodology, /sources, and /disclaimer.