Skip to content
MyClaimWorth
MI
★ US · Midwest

Personal injury in
Michigan.

By Reviewed by Abd Shanti, Founder7 min read

Michigan applies modified-51 comparative fault and runs the United States' most comprehensive PIP no-fault auto scheme, restructured by PA 21 of 2019 with driver-elected coverage tiers.

Michigan operates the most comprehensive no-fault auto insurance scheme in the United States. Originally enacted as PA 1972, the scheme was substantially restructured by Public Act 21 of 2019, effective July 2020. Drivers now choose their PIP coverage limit at four levels: $50,000 (Medicaid recipients), $250,000, $500,000, or unlimited (the historic default).

Tort recovery for non-economic damages is restricted to claims meeting the serious-injury threshold under § 500.3135, death, serious impairment of body function, or permanent serious disfigurement. The medical-malpractice non-economic damages cap is inflation-indexed; for 2025 the figures are approximately $596,000 standard and $1.064 million for catastrophic injuries (death, paraplegia, hemiplegia).

★ statute of limitations
3 years from date of injury

Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5805

★ fault rule
Modified comparative, 51% bar

Modified comparative, recovery barred at 51% claimant fault.

★ MI · statutory caps

What caps recovery.

Caps and ceilings imposed by Michigan law that bear on settlement values.

★ MI · key facts

What makes Michigan different.

The handful of details that distinguish this jurisdiction from its neighbours.

★ MI · by injury

Claim values by injury type.

Reported decisions, the limitation clock, and how fault is apportioned for each injury type under Michigan law.

★ MI · court decisions

What Michigan courts have decided.

Reported Michigan decisions for each injury type, each with a link to the judgment and to the full injury guide.

★ MI · rules that decide claims

The rules in Michigan.

Statutes and rulings that come up again and again in Michigan injury claims, each with its source.

No fault thresholdPain and suffering after a car crash requires death, permanent serious disfigurement, or a serious impairment of body function: “an objectively manifested impairment of an important body function that affects the person’s general ability to lead his or her normal life.”MCL 500.3135(5), as quoted in Patrick v. Turkelson (Mich. Ct. App. 2018)
Seat belt useFailure to wear a belt can be negligence, but cannot reduce the recovery by more than 5%.MCL 257.710e, in the MyClaimWorth seat belt chart
Deadline to sue“3 years after the time of the death or injury for all actions to recover damages for the death of a person, or for injury to a person or property.”MCL 600.5805, as quoted in Henry v. Dow Chemical (Mich. Ct. App. 2017)
Fault ruleA plaintiff more than 50% at fault cannot recover noneconomic damages; economic damages are reduced by the plaintiff’s share.MCL 600.2959, as explained in Kandil-Elsayed v. F & E Oil (Mich. 2023)
Excess economic lossA claim against the at fault driver can include economic losses beyond what no fault benefits pay, as well as noneconomic damages if the threshold is met.Johnson v. Recca (Mich. Ct. App. 2011)
Expert causationA trial court must act as gatekeeper for expert testimony linking a medical event to a brain injury; unreliable causation testimony cannot support a verdict.Craig v. Oakwood Hospital (Mich. 2004)
Malpractice cap for brain injuryIn malpractice cases the higher noneconomic limit, $1,065,000 in 2026, applies to certain permanent injuries, which include brain injury.Michigan Department of Treasury, 2026 noneconomic damages notice
Open and obvious hazardsSince 2023 an open and obvious condition is weighed in breach and comparative fault, not used to deny that the owner owed any duty.Kandil-Elsayed v. F & E Oil (Mich. 2023)
★ other US jurisdictions

Compare across United States.

How Michigan compares with its neighbours in the Midwest on fault rule and limitation period.

JurisdictionFault ruleLimitation
Michigan· you are hereModified comparative, 51% bar3 years from date of injury
Illinois (IL)Modified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injury
Indiana (IN)Modified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injury
Iowa (IA)Modified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injury
Kansas (KS)Modified comparative, 50% bar2 years from date of injury
Minnesota (MN)Modified comparative, 51% bar6 years for personal injury (uncommonly long); 4 years for medical malpractice
Missouri (MO)Pure comparative negligence5 years for personal injury; 2 years for medical malpractice
Nebraska (NE)Modified comparative, 50% bar4 years for personal injury; 2 years for medical malpractice
North Dakota (ND)Modified comparative, 50% bar6 years for personal injury; 2 years for medical malpractice
Ohio (OH)Modified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injury
South Dakota (SD)Slight versus gross negligence3 years from date of injury
Wisconsin (WI)Modified comparative, 51% bar3 years from date of injury

Every United States jurisdiction compared

★ MI · frequently asked

Common questions.

Common questions about personal injury claims in Michigan, answered with the relevant statutory references.

★ editorial note

This page summarises the Michigan statutory framework as of 2026-10-26. It is not legal advice. Statutes change, published verdicts move, and the position within any band depends on facts the page can't see. For representation, consult an attorney qualified in Michigan. See /methodology, /sources, and /disclaimer.