Skip to content
MyClaimWorth
OR
★ Oregon · back & spine

Back & spine settlements
in Oregon.

By Reviewed by Abd Shanti, Founder9 min read

Oregon’s two year deadline starts when you know enough to sue, not when you learn everything. A woman whose pain pump was knocked loose in a crash found out 16 months later but filed after two years, and lost. A driver with four level neck surgery after a rear end collision won a retrial of her claim against her own insurer.

Facts that decide a back & spine claim in Oregon

Deadline to sueTwo years for personal injury claims, running from when the plaintiff knew or reasonably should have known the facts needed for the claim.ORS 12.110(1), as applied in Clark v. Gilstrap (Or. App. 2024)
Crash force evidenceA biomechanical engineer may testify that collision forces were too small to cause the claimed injuries if the testimony meets Oregon’s standards for expert evidence.Thoens v. Safeco Insurance (Or. App. 2015)
Fault rule“Contributory negligence shall not bar recovery … if the fault attributable to the claimant was not greater than the combined fault” of the others, but damages are reduced by the claimant’s percentage.ORS 31.600(1), as quoted in Thomas v. Dillon Family LP II (Or. App. 2022)
★ OR · reported back & spine outcomes

What Oregon courts have awarded.

Real Oregon decisions and verdicts, each linked to the court record or official report.

  • Oregon Court of Appeals · 2024
    Summary judgment for driver affirmed

    After a car accident, Clark reported back, neck and abdominal pain to therapists for months, and her implanted pain pump was checked several times. Nearly 16 months after the crash, surgery showed the pump had come loose from its catheter, which her surgeon blamed on the accident. She sued 13 months after that surgery, two years and five months after the crash. The court held her claim accrued on the day of the accident and affirmed judgment for the other driver.

  • Oregon Court of Appeals · 2015
    UIM judgment reversed and remanded

    In November 2007 Thoens was stopped behind a school bus when another driver rear ended her. She had headaches, neck pain, arm pain, blurred vision and balance problems, and eventually surgery on four levels of her cervical spine; some doctors blamed her vision and balance problems on a brain injury. Her bills passed $200,000, and the other driver’s insurer paid its $50,000 limit. Her own insurer denied underinsured motorist benefits. The court upheld admission of the defense biomechanical testimony but reversed and remanded the UIM judgment.

★ OR · back & spine · in practice

What changes the number here.

What actually moves a back & spine settlement in Oregon.

  1. 1

    Do not wait for a full diagnosis to file. Clark’s claim was barred because she knew of the crash and her pain long before surgery.

  2. 2

    Underinsured motorist coverage matters when the other driver has low limits, as Thoens’s $50,000 recovery shows.

  3. 3

    Expect biomechanical testimony in rear end cases and prepare medical proof to answer it.

★ OR · statute of limitations
2 years from date of injury

Or. Rev. Stat. § 12.110

★ OR · fault rule
Modified comparative, 51% bar

Modified comparative, recovery barred at 51% claimant fault.

★ back & spine · same region & fault regime

Compare to like jurisdictions.

How Oregon's fault rule and limitation period compare to jurisdictions in the same US region and to those running the same fault rule for back & spine claims.

JurisdictionFault ruleLimitationBack & spine page
Oregon · you are hereModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injury—
UtahModified comparative, 50% bar4 years for personal injury; 2 years for medical malpracticeUT · back & spine →
WashingtonPure comparative negligence3 years from date of injuryWA · back & spine →
WyomingModified comparative, 51% bar4 years from date of injuryWY · back & spine →
AlaskaPure comparative negligence2 years from date of injury or discoveryAK · back & spine →
CaliforniaPure comparative negligence2 years for personal injury; 1 year for medical malpractice (with 3-year repose)CA · back & spine →
ColoradoModified comparative, 50% bar2 years for personal injury; 3 years for motor vehicleCO · back & spine →
PennsylvaniaModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injuryPA · back & spine →
South CarolinaModified comparative, 51% bar3 years from date of injurySC · back & spine →
TexasModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injuryTX · back & spine →
VermontModified comparative, 51% bar3 years from date of injuryVT · back & spine →
Rhode IslandPure comparative negligence3 years from date of injuryRI · back & spine →
South DakotaSlight versus gross negligence3 years from date of injurySD · back & spine →
★ OR · back & spine · frequently asked

Common questions.

Each answer is independently coherent and references the relevant statute or authority document.

★ editorial note

Figures on this page are not quotes for any specific case. For representation, consult an attorney admitted in Oregon. See /methodology, /sources, and /disclaimer.