Skip to content
MyClaimWorth
CT
★ Connecticut · whiplash

Whiplash settlements
in Connecticut.

By Reviewed by Abd Shanti, Founder9 min read

The leading Connecticut whiplash decision is about a jury that paid the medical bills and nothing else. In 2022 the state Supreme Court held that a judge may add money for pain and suffering when a jury accepts the treatment was needed but awards nothing for the pain behind it.

Facts that decide a whiplash claim in Connecticut

Deadline to sueTwo years from the date the injury is first sustained or discovered, and never more than three years from the crash.Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-584
Fault ruleYou recover as long as your negligence is not greater than the combined negligence of the people you sue, so a 51% share bars you. Below that, the award is reduced by your percentage.Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-572h(b)
Minimum liability insurance$25,000 per person, $50,000 per accident, $25,000 property damage.Conn. Gen. Stat. § 14-112(a)
Uninsured and underinsured coverEvery Connecticut auto policy must include it, with limits at least equal to the minimum liability limits.Conn. Gen. Stat. § 38a-336(a)
Health insurance paymentsThe judge deducts what your health insurer paid from the economic part of the verdict, unless the insurer has a right to be repaid, in which case nothing is deducted.Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-225a; Marciano v. Jiminez (Conn. 2016)
Seat belt useNot wearing a belt is not contributory negligence and is not admissible in a civil case.Conn. Gen. Stat. § 14-100a
★ CT · reported whiplash outcomes

What Connecticut courts have awarded.

Real Connecticut decisions and verdicts, each linked to the court record or official report.

  • Connecticut Supreme Court · 2022
    Medical bills of $17,228.38 and $11,864.94 awarded, $0 for pain, then additur upheld

    Two men treated for neck and back injuries with about eight months of chiropractic care and one epidural steroid injection each. The jury paid their bills, trimming only the chiropractic charges, but gave nothing for pain. The Supreme Court held the trial judge was right to add damages for pain and suffering; because the defendants refused the addition, the case went to a new trial on damages.

  • Connecticut Appellate Court · 2015
    Verdict with no award for pain, affirmed

    A driver said her body jerked around in the impact and she hit her hip. The jury awarded no noneconomic damages and the court refused to add any, holding that a plaintiff must prove the pain itself with reasonable certainty, not just that she had treatment.

★ CT · whiplash · in practice

What changes the number here.

What actually moves a whiplash settlement in Connecticut.

  1. 1

    The two cases pull in different directions, and the difference is the evidence of pain. In Maldonado the jury accepted that injections and months of therapy were reasonable and necessary, which the Supreme Court said cannot sit with a finding of no pain. In Melendez the plaintiff did not prove the pain, so a verdict without it stood. Your own account of the pain, recorded by your doctors from the first visit, is part of the proof.

  2. 2

    Connecticut deducts collateral payments from the economic side of a verdict, which surprises many claimants. If your health insurer paid the bills and has no right to be repaid, the judge subtracts those payments after the verdict. If the insurer does have a repayment right, as most do, Marciano holds that nothing is subtracted.

  3. 3

    Uninsured and underinsured cover is mandatory in every Connecticut policy, so a neck claim against a driver with only the $25,000 minimum can continue against your own insurer for the rest.

★ CT · statute of limitations
2 years from date of injury

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-584

★ CT · fault rule
Modified comparative, 51% bar

Modified comparative, recovery barred at 51% or more claimant fault.

★ whiplash · same region & fault regime

Compare to like jurisdictions.

How Connecticut's fault rule and limitation period compare to jurisdictions in the same US region and to those running the same fault rule for whiplash claims.

JurisdictionFault ruleLimitationWhiplash page
Connecticut · you are hereModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injury—
DelawareModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injuryDE · whiplash →
District of ColumbiaPure contributory negligence3 years from date of injuryDC · whiplash →
MaineModified comparative, 50% bar6 years for personal injury, longest in the USME · whiplash →
MarylandPure contributory negligence3 years from date of injuryMD · whiplash →
MassachusettsModified comparative, 51% bar3 years from date of injuryMA · whiplash →
New HampshireModified comparative, 51% bar3 years from date of injuryNH · whiplash →
FloridaModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injury (was 4; reduced by HB 837)FL · whiplash →
HawaiiModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injuryHI · whiplash →
IllinoisModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injuryIL · whiplash →
IndianaModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injuryIN · whiplash →
GeorgiaModified comparative, 50% bar2 years from date of injuryGA · whiplash →
IdahoModified comparative, 50% bar2 years from date of injuryID · whiplash →
★ CT · whiplash · frequently asked

Common questions.

Each answer is independently coherent and references the relevant statute or authority document.

★ editorial note

Figures on this page are not quotes for any specific case. For representation, consult an attorney admitted in Connecticut. See /methodology, /sources, and /disclaimer.