Skip to content
MyClaimWorth
IL
★ Illinois · whiplash

Whiplash settlements
in Illinois.

By Reviewed by Abd Shanti, Founder9 min read

Illinois gives whiplash claimants one clear advantage: a defendant cannot use the fact that you were unbelted to cut your award. What decides the value is how the jury sees the medical evidence, and juries often award medical bills while giving little for pain.

Facts that decide a whiplash claim in Illinois

Seat belt useNot wearing a seat belt is not evidence of negligence and cannot reduce any recovery.625 ILCS 5/12-603.1(c), in the MyClaimWorth seat belt chart
Deadline to sueTwo years: injury actions “shall be commenced within 2 years next after the cause of action accrued.”735 ILCS 5/13-202, as quoted in Mickiewicz v. Generations at Regency (Ill. App. 2020)
Fault ruleYou are barred only if your contributory fault is more than 50% of the proximate cause of the injury; otherwise the award is reduced by your share.735 ILCS 5/2-1116, as explained in Gratzle v. Sears, Roebuck (Ill. App. 1993)
Raising a low awardA judge may add to a verdict (additur) only to fix an omitted, easily calculated item of damages, not where the evidence on the injury is in conflict.Poliszczuk v. Winkler (Ill. App. 2008)
Suing a city or countyNo action may be brought against a local public entity or its employees unless it is “commenced within one year from the date that the injury was received or the cause of action accrued.”745 ILCS 10/8-101(a), as quoted in Harvest Church v. City of East St. Louis (Ill. App. 2011)
★ IL · reported whiplash outcomes

What Illinois courts have awarded.

Real Illinois decisions and verdicts, each linked to the court record or official report.

  • Illinois Appellate Court, First District · 2008
    $30,100 and $9,000 verdicts, affirmed

    A brother and sister were hurt in a collision in which the other driver admitted negligence. The sister felt neck and back pain on the way to the hospital, could not move her neck the next day, and treated with ice, heat and over the counter medicine. The jury awarded her $30,100, of which $24,100 was medical expenses and $6,000 pain and suffering, with nothing for disability or loss of a normal life. The appeals court affirmed and refused an additur.

  • Illinois Supreme Court · 2008
    Full $80,163 in billed medical costs restored

    A driver ran a red light and the crash aggravated the plaintiff’s preexisting condition, leading to spinal fusion. The trial court cut her medical damages from the $80,163.47 billed to the $19,005.50 Medicare and Medicaid paid. The Supreme Court reversed, holding she could recover the reasonable value of her care.

★ IL · whiplash · in practice

What changes the number here.

What actually moves a whiplash settlement in Illinois.

  1. 1

    Illinois juries often split the difference in neck claims. In Poliszczuk the jury accepted the injury and paid the medical bills, but gave only $6,000 for pain and nothing for disability. Evidence of how the pain changed your daily life is what moves those lines above zero.

  2. 2

    Low verdicts are hard to fix. The appeals court in Poliszczuk held a judge cannot add damages where the medical evidence conflicts, so the case has to be won at trial.

  3. 3

    Your medical bills count at their billed value. Wills v. Foster lets a plaintiff prove the reasonable value of treatment even when Medicare or insurance paid a lower rate.

★ IL · statute of limitations
2 years from date of injury

735 ILCS 5/13-202

★ IL · fault rule
Modified comparative, 51% bar

Modified comparative, recovery barred at 51% claimant fault.

★ whiplash · same region & fault regime

Compare to like jurisdictions.

How Illinois's fault rule and limitation period compare to jurisdictions in the same US region and to those running the same fault rule for whiplash claims.

JurisdictionFault ruleLimitationWhiplash page
Illinois · you are hereModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injury—
IndianaModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injuryIN · whiplash →
IowaModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injuryIA · whiplash →
KansasModified comparative, 50% bar2 years from date of injuryKS · whiplash →
MichiganModified comparative, 51% bar3 years from date of injuryMI · whiplash →
MinnesotaModified comparative, 51% bar6 years for personal injury (uncommonly long); 4 years for medical malpracticeMN · whiplash →
MissouriPure comparative negligence5 years for personal injury; 2 years for medical malpracticeMO · whiplash →
LouisianaModified comparative, 51% bar1 year (la prescription), extended to 2 years by Act 423 (2024) for tort claims accruing on or after July 1, 2024LA · whiplash →
MassachusettsModified comparative, 51% bar3 years from date of injuryMA · whiplash →
MontanaModified comparative, 51% bar3 years from date of injuryMT · whiplash →
NevadaModified comparative, 51% bar2 years for personal injury; 3 years for medical malpracticeNV · whiplash →
KentuckyPure comparative negligence1 year for personal injury (one of the shortest in the US)KY · whiplash →
MaineModified comparative, 50% bar6 years for personal injury, longest in the USME · whiplash →
★ IL · whiplash · frequently asked

Common questions.

Each answer is independently coherent and references the relevant statute or authority document.

★ editorial note

Figures on this page are not quotes for any specific case. For representation, consult an attorney admitted in Illinois. See /methodology, /sources, and /disclaimer.