Skip to content
MyClaimWorth
United States · head & brain

Head & brain claim values
in United States.

By 9 min read

Concussion through to traumatic brain injury. Bands on this page are sourced to state-by-state tort law · jury verdict reporters · statutory caps and reflect the typical settlement values for head & braincases across the relevant severity tiers. The position within a band depends on facts the page can't see — severity, prognosis, recovery time, the strength of medical evidence, and any percentage of fault attributed to the claimant under United States's comparative-fault rule.

typical band · US
$500,000 – multi-million
Severe traumatic brain injury
Catastrophic-case reported decisions
head & brain severity tiers in US

How the band stratifies.

Multiple severity tiers exist for this injury class. The country-page authority distinguishes between them as follows.

Head & brain severity tiers in United States
Severity tierBandBasis
Concussion / mild TBI$25,000 – $100,000Reported decisions
Severe traumatic brain injury$500,000 – multi-millionCatastrophic-case reported decisions
statute of limitations
Varies by state — most commonly 2 or 3 years

State codes

Range: Florida and Texas at 2 years (Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.003); New York at 3 years (CPLR § 214); Maine at 6 years (14 M.R.S. § 752, the longest in the US). Statutes of repose layer on top in product-liability and construction-defect cases. Federal Tort Claims Act has its own two-year administrative limitation.

fault allocation
Varies by state

Pure contributory negligence (1% bars recovery) in Alabama, Maryland, North Carolina, Virginia, and DC. Pure comparative in 13 states including California, Florida, New York, and Washington. Modified comparative with a 50% bar in 10 states. Modified comparative with a 51% bar in 23 states.

caps that bear on this injury

What caps recovery.

Statutory caps and ceilings that apply to head & brain damages in United States.

US · procedural pathway

From injury to settlement.

The steps a head & brain claim moves through under United States law, from medical stability to settlement.

  1. 1
    Reach medical stability and assemble documentation

    Medical records, imaging, expert reports, payslips for lost wages, and receipts for out-of-pocket costs. Documentation gaps drive under-valued settlements.

  2. 2
    Identify the controlling state law

    For an interstate accident, the conflict-of-laws analysis matters. Most states apply lex loci delicti, but a few apply most-significant-relationship analysis under Restatement (Second).

  3. 3
    Compute special damages

    Past and future medical expenses, lost wages, loss of earning capacity, property damage, and reasonable out-of-pocket costs. Future expenses require expert testimony.

  4. 4
    Anchor non-economic damages

    Compare to verdict reporter aggregates in the state. The multiplier method (1.5×–5× medical specials) is a starting point used by adjusters; courts do not impose it.

  5. 5
    Apply the comparative-fault rule

    Pure comparative reduces by the claimant's percentage; modified-50/51 cuts off above the threshold; contributory bars at 1%.

  6. 6
    Apply statutory caps

    Medical-malpractice caps in CA, TX, OH and others bite on non-economic damages; punitive-damages caps and the State Farm constitutional ceiling apply on punitives.

  7. 7
    Demand letter, mediation, then suit

    Most states allow direct demand against the insurer. Many states require pre-suit mediation in medical-malpractice cases. Suit is the last resort and is rare — over 95% of cases settle.

head & brain bands · all 15 jurisdictions

Compare to other countries.

How this injury values across the other jurisdictions on the site. Click any country to read the deeper context.

JurisdictionBandAuthority
United States· you are here$500,000 – multi-millionstate-by-state tort law · jury verdict reporters · statutory caps
United Kingdom£282,010 – £403,990Judicial College Guidelines (16th ed.)
Ireland€175,000 – €550,000+Personal Injuries Guidelines (Judicial Council)
CanadaC$200,000 – Andrews capAndrews v Grand & Toy non-pecuniary cap
AustraliaAU$300,000 – AU$750,000+state-by-state CTP and Civil Liability Acts
Spain€200,000 – €400,000+Baremo (Law 35/2015) — mandatory points-based scale
Italy€300,000 – €1,000,000+Tabelle Milanesi (Tribunale di Milano)
Germany€200,000 – €800,000+Schmerzensgeldtabelle (Pain & Suffering Tables)
France€300,000 – €1,000,000+Référentiel Mornet · Barème Dalloz
New ZealandAccident Compensation Act 2001 · ACC entitlement schedules
SingaporeS$300,000 – S$1,000,000+Civil Law Act · State Courts and High Court precedent
Hong KongHK$2,000,000 – HK$3,000,000+Personal Injuries List quanta tables · Court of Appeal precedent
Japan¥18,000,000 – ¥80,000,000+赤い本 (Akai-bon) · 青本 (Aoi-bon) court-published quantum tables
South Korea₩300,000,000 – ₩1,000,000,000+Civil Act · Supreme Court of Korea precedent · Hoffman/Leibniz formulae
TaiwanNT$3,000,000 – NT$10,000,000+Civil Code · Supreme Court precedent · Compulsory Auto Liability Insurance Act
US · head & brain · frequently asked

Common questions.

Each answer is independently coherent and sourced to the authority documents on this page.

editorial note

Numbers on this page are starting points sourced to state-by-state tort law · jury verdict reporters · statutory caps. They are not quotes for any specific case. For representation, consult a solicitor or attorney qualified in United States. See /methodology for how each band is derived, /sources for the standing authority list, and /disclaimer for the scope statement.