Skip to content
MyClaimWorth
Japan · head & brain

Head & brain claim values
in Japan.

By 9 min read

Concussion through to traumatic brain injury. Bands on this page are sourced to 赤い本 (Akai-bon) · 青本 (Aoi-bon) court-published quantum tables and reflect the typical settlement values for head & braincases across the relevant severity tiers. The position within a band depends on facts the page can't see — severity, prognosis, recovery time, the strength of medical evidence, and any percentage of fault attributed to the claimant under Japan's comparative-fault rule.

typical band · Japan
¥18,000,000 – ¥80,000,000+
Severe brain injury (Grade 1–3)
Akai-bon top grades plus future loss using Leibniz coefficient
statute of limitations
3 years from knowledge; 20-year longstop

Civil Code art. 724

Limitation runs from the date both the harm and the responsible party were known.

fault allocation
Comparative (過失相殺) — proportional reduction

Civil Code art. 722(2). Strict liability for motor vehicles under the Automobile Liability Security Law (自賠法).

caps that bear on this injury

What caps recovery.

Statutory caps and ceilings that apply to head & brain damages in Japan.

Japan · procedural pathway

From injury to settlement.

The steps a head & brain claim moves through under Japan law, from medical stability to settlement.

  1. 1
    Insurance negotiation

    Most claims settle directly with the at-fault driver's liability insurer using Akai-bon as the reference.

  2. 2
    JCAA / financial ADR

    Out-of-court ADR through the Japan Center for Settlement of Traffic Accident Disputes (交通事故紛争処理センター).

  3. 3
    Court proceedings

    If ADR fails, suit filed in the Summary Court (≤¥1.4M), District Court (above), or family court depending on parties.

  4. 4
    Trial

    Bench trial; appellate review through the High Court and Supreme Court.

head & brain bands · all 15 jurisdictions

Compare to other countries.

How this injury values across the other jurisdictions on the site. Click any country to read the deeper context.

JurisdictionBandAuthority
United States$500,000 – multi-millionstate-by-state tort law · jury verdict reporters · statutory caps
United Kingdom£282,010 – £403,990Judicial College Guidelines (16th ed.)
Ireland€175,000 – €550,000+Personal Injuries Guidelines (Judicial Council)
CanadaC$200,000 – Andrews capAndrews v Grand & Toy non-pecuniary cap
AustraliaAU$300,000 – AU$750,000+state-by-state CTP and Civil Liability Acts
Spain€200,000 – €400,000+Baremo (Law 35/2015) — mandatory points-based scale
Italy€300,000 – €1,000,000+Tabelle Milanesi (Tribunale di Milano)
Germany€200,000 – €800,000+Schmerzensgeldtabelle (Pain & Suffering Tables)
France€300,000 – €1,000,000+Référentiel Mornet · Barème Dalloz
New ZealandAccident Compensation Act 2001 · ACC entitlement schedules
SingaporeS$300,000 – S$1,000,000+Civil Law Act · State Courts and High Court precedent
Hong KongHK$2,000,000 – HK$3,000,000+Personal Injuries List quanta tables · Court of Appeal precedent
Japan· you are here¥18,000,000 – ¥80,000,000+赤い本 (Akai-bon) · 青本 (Aoi-bon) court-published quantum tables
South Korea₩300,000,000 – ₩1,000,000,000+Civil Act · Supreme Court of Korea precedent · Hoffman/Leibniz formulae
TaiwanNT$3,000,000 – NT$10,000,000+Civil Code · Supreme Court precedent · Compulsory Auto Liability Insurance Act
Japan · head & brain · frequently asked

Common questions.

Each answer is independently coherent and sourced to the authority documents on this page.

editorial note

Numbers on this page are starting points sourced to 赤い本 (Akai-bon) · 青本 (Aoi-bon) court-published quantum tables. They are not quotes for any specific case. For representation, consult a solicitor or attorney qualified in Japan. See /methodology for how each band is derived, /sources for the standing authority list, and /disclaimer for the scope statement.