Whiplash settlements
in Montana.
Montana juries decide rear end injury claims, and the Supreme Court protects fair verdicts in both directions. A woman rear ended in Malta won $168,500, and the court reinstated the verdict after a judge threw it out over comments about insurance. Another woman got a new trial when the photos the defense stipulated to turned out to show damage from a different crash.
Facts that decide a whiplash claim in Montana
| Insurance references | A verdict should not be thrown out for statements that never used the word insurance and caused no shown prejudice.Voegel v. Salsbery (Mont. 2023) |
|---|---|
| Fault rule | Contributory negligence does not bar recovery “if the contributory negligence was not greater than the negligence of the person or the combined negligence of all persons against whom recovery is sought”; damages are reduced by your share.Mont. Code Ann. § 27-1-702 |
| Seat belt use | Evidence of wearing or not wearing a belt “is not admissible in any civil action for personal injury,” and not wearing one is not negligence.Mont. Code Ann. § 61-13-106 |
The US band is the starting point. Montana's fault rule and any applicable cap then adjust the figure.