Skip to content
MyClaimWorth
MT
★ Montana · whiplash

Whiplash settlements
in Montana.

By 9 min read

Montana juries decide rear end injury claims, and the Supreme Court protects fair verdicts in both directions. A woman rear ended in Malta won $168,500, and the court reinstated the verdict after a judge threw it out over comments about insurance. Another woman got a new trial when the photos the defense stipulated to turned out to show damage from a different crash.

Facts that decide a whiplash claim in Montana

Insurance referencesA verdict should not be thrown out for statements that never used the word insurance and caused no shown prejudice.Voegel v. Salsbery (Mont. 2023)
Fault ruleContributory negligence does not bar recovery “if the contributory negligence was not greater than the negligence of the person or the combined negligence of all persons against whom recovery is sought”; damages are reduced by your share.Mont. Code Ann. § 27-1-702
Seat belt useEvidence of wearing or not wearing a belt “is not admissible in any civil action for personal injury,” and not wearing one is not negligence.Mont. Code Ann. § 61-13-106
★ band · US federal frame
$10,000 to $40,000
Whiplash / soft tissue (1 to 2 years)
Insurance settlement data plus VerdictSearch tabulations

The US band is the starting point. Montana's fault rule and any applicable cap then adjust the figure.

★ MT · reported whiplash outcomes

What Montana courts have awarded.

Real Montana decisions and verdicts, each linked to the court record or official report.

  • Montana Supreme Court · 2023
    $168,500 verdict reinstated

    On June 18, 2018, in Malta, Cheryl Voegel slowed for a child waiting to cross the street and a 17 year old in an F-150 ran into her Jeep. The driver admitted negligence; causation, damages and Voegel’s own negligence were tried in May 2022. The jury awarded $168,500. The trial judge granted a new trial over two comments said to refer to insurance; the Supreme Court reinstated the verdict.

  • Montana Supreme Court · 2015
    New trial ordered

    On September 30, 2011, George rear ended O’Connor while she was stopped at a railroad crossing in Helena, and admitted liability but disputed the injuries. The parties stipulated to photos of George’s car, but at trial George testified some showed damage from hitting a bird at 60 mph a year later. The court held the misrepresentation denied O’Connor a fair trial and ordered a new one.

★ MT · whiplash · in practice

What changes the number here.

What actually moves a whiplash settlement in Montana.

  1. 1

    An admission of liability still leaves causation and damages for the jury.

  2. 2

    Check every exhibit the other side offers, even stipulated photos, as O’Connor’s case shows.

  3. 3

    Do not mention the other driver’s insurance at trial; it can cost a verdict.

★ MT · statute of limitations
3 years from date of injury

Mont. Code Ann. § 27-2-204

★ MT · fault rule
Modified comparative, 51% bar

Modified comparative, recovery barred at 51% claimant fault.

★ MT · caps

What caps recovery.

Statutory caps that may bear on a whiplash settlement in Montana.

★ whiplash severity tiers · US frame

How the band stratifies.

The state-by-state tort law · jury verdict reporters · statutory caps stratifies whiplash into the tiers below. Montana courts apply the same tier structure, adjusted for state-specific factors.

Severity tierBandBasis
Whiplash / soft tissue (minor)$3,000 to $15,000Settlement aggregates from insurance industry sources
Whiplash / soft tissue (1 to 2 years)$10,000 to $40,000Insurance settlement data plus VerdictSearch tabulations
★ whiplash · same region & fault regime

Compare to like jurisdictions.

How Montana's fault rule and limitation period compare to jurisdictions in the same US region and to those running the same fault rule for whiplash claims.

JurisdictionFault ruleLimitationWhiplash page
Montana · you are hereModified comparative, 51% bar3 years from date of injury—
NevadaModified comparative, 51% bar2 years for personal injury; 3 years for medical malpracticeNV · whiplash →
OregonModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injuryOR · whiplash →
UtahModified comparative, 50% bar4 years for personal injury; 2 years for medical malpracticeUT · whiplash →
WashingtonPure comparative negligence3 years from date of injuryWA · whiplash →
WyomingModified comparative, 51% bar4 years from date of injuryWY · whiplash →
AlaskaPure comparative negligence2 years from date of injury or discoveryAK · whiplash →
New HampshireModified comparative, 51% bar3 years from date of injuryNH · whiplash →
New JerseyModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injuryNJ · whiplash →
OhioModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injuryOH · whiplash →
OklahomaModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injuryOK · whiplash →
NebraskaModified comparative, 50% bar4 years for personal injury; 2 years for medical malpracticeNE · whiplash →
New MexicoPure comparative negligence3 years from date of injuryNM · whiplash →
★ MT · whiplash · frequently asked

Common questions.

Each answer is independently coherent and references the relevant statute or authority document.

Sources

Checked 2026-09-30. Every figure on this page comes from one of these documents.

★ editorial note

Figures on this page are starting points: the US band adjusted for Montana's statutory framework. They are not quotes for any specific case. For representation, consult an attorney admitted in Montana. See /methodology, /sources, and /disclaimer.