Skip to content
MyClaimWorth
OK
★ Oklahoma · whiplash

Whiplash settlements
in Oklahoma.

By Reviewed by Abd Shanti, Founder9 min read

Oklahoma is one of the few states where a jury can hear that you were not wearing a seat belt, and one where a gap in treatment after a rear end crash can sink a whiplash claim entirely.

Facts that decide a whiplash claim in Oklahoma

Deadline to sueTwo years for an action for injury to the rights of another not arising on contract.12 O.S. § 95(A)(3), as applied in Hough Oilfield Service v. Newton, 2017 OK CIV APP 31
Fault ruleYour own negligence does not bar recovery unless it is of greater degree than the defendants’ negligence, so a 51% share bars you and a smaller share reduces the award.23 O.S. § 13, as quoted in Edwards v. McKee (Okla. Civ. App. 2003)
Seat belt useAdmissible in civil suits, unless the injured person is a child under 16.47 O.S. § 12-420, in the MyClaimWorth seat belt chart
Cap on pain and sufferingThe statutory $350,000 noneconomic cap was struck down in 2019 as an unconstitutional special law.Beason v. I. E. Miller Services (Okla. 2019), holding 23 O.S. § 61.2(B)-(F) void
The jury and medical expertsThe jury may accept or disregard all, some, or part of an expert’s opinion, including a defense expert who concedes some injury.Benningfield v. Fischer-Columbo (Okla. Civ. App. 2021)
★ OK · reported whiplash outcomes

What Oklahoma courts have awarded.

Real Oklahoma decisions and verdicts, each linked to the court record or official report.

  • Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals · 2021
    Defense verdict, affirmed

    A driver stopped at a red light was rear ended in 2015 but did not seek treatment for about five months. She then saw a chiropractor for neck, back, and shoulder pain; the MRIs showed an unremarkable lumbar spine and only a mild disc bulge at C5-6 with no sign of traumatic injury. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant even though the defense expert said she had strain injuries, and the verdict was affirmed.

  • Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals · 2003
    Denial of new trial affirmed

    An appeal over a personal injury verdict in which the court set out the full text of Oklahoma’s comparative negligence statute and affirmed the trial court’s refusal to order a new trial.

★ OK · whiplash · in practice

What changes the number here.

What actually moves a whiplash settlement in Oklahoma.

  1. 1

    Delay is the single biggest problem in an Oklahoma whiplash claim. In Benningfield the five month gap before any treatment, and imaging that showed nothing traumatic, allowed a jury to find for the defendant despite a rear end collision at a red light.

  2. 2

    A jury can decide that an injury existed and still award nothing. The defense expert in Benningfield conceded strain injuries; the appeals court held the jury was free to weigh that testimony as it saw fit.

  3. 3

    Seat belt evidence cuts both ways in Oklahoma. Because it is admissible for adults, a defendant can argue an unbelted driver’s neck injury was worse than it would have been. Tell your lawyer early if you were not belted.

★ OK · statute of limitations
2 years from date of injury

Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 95

★ OK · fault rule
Modified comparative, 51% bar

Modified comparative, recovery barred at 51% claimant fault.

★ OK · caps

What caps recovery.

Statutory caps that may bear on a whiplash settlement in Oklahoma.

★ whiplash · same region & fault regime

Compare to like jurisdictions.

How Oklahoma's fault rule and limitation period compare to jurisdictions in the same US region and to those running the same fault rule for whiplash claims.

JurisdictionFault ruleLimitationWhiplash page
Oklahoma · you are hereModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injury—
ArizonaPure comparative negligence2 years from date of injuryAZ · whiplash →
New MexicoPure comparative negligence3 years from date of injuryNM · whiplash →
OregonModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injuryOR · whiplash →
PennsylvaniaModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injuryPA · whiplash →
South CarolinaModified comparative, 51% bar3 years from date of injurySC · whiplash →
TexasModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injuryTX · whiplash →
Rhode IslandPure comparative negligence3 years from date of injuryRI · whiplash →
South DakotaSlight versus gross negligence3 years from date of injurySD · whiplash →
TennesseeModified comparative, 50% bar1 year from date of injury, among the shortest in the USTN · whiplash →
UtahModified comparative, 50% bar4 years for personal injury; 2 years for medical malpracticeUT · whiplash →
VermontModified comparative, 51% bar3 years from date of injuryVT · whiplash →
VirginiaPure contributory negligence2 years from date of injuryVA · whiplash →
★ OK · whiplash · frequently asked

Common questions.

Each answer is independently coherent and references the relevant statute or authority document.

★ editorial note

Figures on this page are not quotes for any specific case. For representation, consult an attorney admitted in Oklahoma. See /methodology, /sources, and /disclaimer.