Skip to content
MyClaimWorth
New Zealand · medical negligence

Medical negligence claim values
in New Zealand.

By 9 min read

Misdiagnosis, surgical error, delayed treatment. Bands on this page are sourced to Accident Compensation Act 2001 · ACC entitlement schedules and reflect the typical settlement values for medical negligencecases across the relevant severity tiers. The position within a band depends on facts the page can't see — severity, prognosis, recovery time, the strength of medical evidence, and any percentage of fault attributed to the claimant under New Zealand's comparative-fault rule.

statute of limitations
Time limits for claim and review actions vary by entitlement

Accident Compensation Act 2001

Claims for cover should be lodged as soon as practicable. Reviews of decisions must be lodged within 3 months. Common-law residual claims follow Limitation Act 2010.

fault allocation
No-fault — fault is not a relevant consideration for cover

ACC pays regardless of fault. Outside ACC scope (rare), Limitation Act 2010 contributory-negligence rules apply to surviving common-law claims.

caps that bear on this injury

What caps recovery.

Statutory caps and ceilings that apply to medical negligence damages in New Zealand.

NZ · procedural pathway

From injury to settlement.

The steps a medical negligence claim moves through under New Zealand law, from medical stability to settlement.

  1. 1
    Lodge ACC claim

    A treating medical practitioner lodges the claim. Most personal-injury claims are accepted automatically.

  2. 2
    Cover decision

    ACC determines whether the injury falls within cover. Treatment is generally provided pending the decision.

  3. 3
    Entitlements

    Once cover is confirmed, ACC processes weekly compensation, treatment, rehabilitation, and lump-sum entitlements as they accrue.

  4. 4
    Review

    Claimant can seek a review of any ACC decision within 3 months. Reviews are heard by an independent reviewer.

  5. 5
    Appeal

    A review decision can be appealed to the District Court. Further appeals to High Court and beyond on points of law.

medical negligence bands · all 15 jurisdictions

Compare to other countries.

How this injury values across the other jurisdictions on the site. Click any country to read the deeper context.

JurisdictionBandAuthority
United States$30,000 – statutory capstate-by-state tort law · jury verdict reporters · statutory caps
United KingdomJudicial College Guidelines (16th ed.)
Ireland€30,000 – €400,000+Personal Injuries Guidelines (Judicial Council)
CanadaAndrews v Grand & Toy non-pecuniary cap
Australiastate-by-state CTP and Civil Liability Acts
Spain€50,000 – €300,000Baremo (Law 35/2015) — mandatory points-based scale
Italy€100,000 – €500,000Tabelle Milanesi (Tribunale di Milano)
Germany€50,000 – €400,000Schmerzensgeldtabelle (Pain & Suffering Tables)
France€100,000 – €500,000Référentiel Mornet · Barème Dalloz
New Zealand· you are hereAccident Compensation Act 2001 · ACC entitlement schedules
SingaporeS$50,000 – S$500,000Civil Law Act · State Courts and High Court precedent
Hong KongHK$500,000 – HK$3,000,000Personal Injuries List quanta tables · Court of Appeal precedent
Japan¥5,000,000 – ¥30,000,000赤い本 (Akai-bon) · 青本 (Aoi-bon) court-published quantum tables
South Korea₩50,000,000 – ₩500,000,000Civil Act · Supreme Court of Korea precedent · Hoffman/Leibniz formulae
TaiwanNT$500,000 – NT$5,000,000Civil Code · Supreme Court precedent · Compulsory Auto Liability Insurance Act
NZ · medical negligence · frequently asked

Common questions.

Each answer is independently coherent and sourced to the authority documents on this page.

editorial note

Numbers on this page are starting points sourced to Accident Compensation Act 2001 · ACC entitlement schedules. They are not quotes for any specific case. For representation, consult a solicitor or attorney qualified in New Zealand. See /methodology for how each band is derived, /sources for the standing authority list, and /disclaimer for the scope statement.