Skip to content
MyClaimWorth
★ South Korea · medical negligence

Medical negligence claim values
in South Korea.

By 9 min read

Misdiagnosis, surgical error, delayed treatment. Bands on this page are sourced to Civil Act · Supreme Court of Korea precedent · Hoffman/Leibniz formulae and reflect the typical settlement values for medical negligencecases across the relevant severity tiers. The position within a band depends on facts the page can't see — severity, prognosis, recovery time, the strength of medical evidence, and any percentage of fault attributed to the claimant under South Korea's comparative-fault rule.

★ typical band · S. Korea
₩50,000,000 – ₩500,000,000
Medical negligence
Supreme Court bands; medical expert evidence required
★ statute of limitations
3 years from knowledge; 10-year longstop

Civil Act art. 766

Discovery rule applies.

★ fault allocation
Comparative (과실상계) — proportional reduction

Civil Act art. 763 incorporating art. 396. No bar threshold.

★ caps that bear on this injury

What caps recovery.

Statutory caps and ceilings that apply to medical negligence damages in South Korea.

★ S. Korea · procedural pathway

From injury to settlement.

The steps a medical negligence claim moves through under South Korea law, from medical stability to settlement.

  1. 1
    Insurance negotiation

    Most claims settle with CALI-mandated and voluntary insurers using published bands.

  2. 2
    Korea Consumer Agency mediation

    For consumer-related disputes including some PI, mediation via KCA or Financial Supervisory Service.

  3. 3
    Court proceedings

    Suit filed in the Civil Court of the relevant District Court.

  4. 4
    Trial

    Bench trial; appellate review through the High Court and Supreme Court.

★ medical negligence bands · all 15 jurisdictions

Compare to other countries.

How this injury values across the other jurisdictions on the site. Click any country to read the deeper context.

JurisdictionBandAuthority
United States$30,000 – statutory capstate-by-state tort law · jury verdict reporters · statutory caps
United KingdomValued on the JC Guidelines bracket for the resulting injuryJudicial College Guidelines (16th ed.)
Ireland€30,000 – €400,000+Personal Injuries Guidelines (Judicial Council)
CanadaInjury-dependent; non-pecuniary loss is cappedAndrews v Grand & Toy non-pecuniary cap
AustraliaInjury-dependent; state civil-liability caps applystate-by-state CTP and Civil Liability Acts
Spain€50,000 – €300,000Baremo (Law 35/2015) — mandatory points-based scale
Italy€100,000 – €500,000Tabelle Milanesi (Tribunale di Milano)
Germany€50,000 – €400,000Schmerzensgeldtabelle (Pain & Suffering Tables)
France€100,000 – €500,000Référentiel Mornet · Barème Dalloz
New ZealandACC treatment-injury cover — no negligence claimAccident Compensation Act 2001 · ACC entitlement schedules
SingaporeS$50,000 – S$500,000Civil Law Act · State Courts and High Court precedent
Hong KongHK$500,000 – HK$3,000,000Personal Injuries List quanta tables · Court of Appeal precedent
Japan¥5,000,000 – ¥30,000,000赤い本 (Akai-bon) · 青本 (Aoi-bon) court-published quantum tables
South Korea· you are here₩50,000,000 – ₩500,000,000Civil Act · Supreme Court of Korea precedent · Hoffman/Leibniz formulae
TaiwanNT$500,000 – NT$5,000,000Civil Code · Supreme Court precedent · Compulsory Auto Liability Insurance Act
★ S. Korea · medical negligence · frequently asked

Common questions.

Each answer is independently coherent and sourced to the authority documents on this page.

★ editorial note

Numbers on this page are starting points sourced to Civil Act · Supreme Court of Korea precedent · Hoffman/Leibniz formulae. They are not quotes for any specific case. For representation, consult a solicitor or attorney qualified in South Korea. See /methodology for how each band is derived, /sources for the standing authority list, and /disclaimer for the scope statement.