Skip to content
MyClaimWorth
South Korea · medical negligence

Medical negligence claim values
in South Korea.

By 9 min read

Misdiagnosis, surgical error, delayed treatment. Bands on this page are sourced to Civil Act · Supreme Court of Korea precedent · Hoffman/Leibniz formulae and reflect the typical settlement values for medical negligencecases across the relevant severity tiers. The position within a band depends on facts the page can't see — severity, prognosis, recovery time, the strength of medical evidence, and any percentage of fault attributed to the claimant under South Korea's comparative-fault rule.

typical band · S. Korea
₩50,000,000 – ₩500,000,000
Medical negligence
Supreme Court bands; medical expert evidence required
statute of limitations
3 years from knowledge; 10-year longstop

Civil Act art. 766

Discovery rule applies.

fault allocation
Comparative (과실상계) — proportional reduction

Civil Act art. 763 incorporating art. 396. No bar threshold.

caps that bear on this injury

What caps recovery.

Statutory caps and ceilings that apply to medical negligence damages in South Korea.

S. Korea · procedural pathway

From injury to settlement.

The steps a medical negligence claim moves through under South Korea law, from medical stability to settlement.

  1. 1
    Insurance negotiation

    Most claims settle with CALI-mandated and voluntary insurers using published bands.

  2. 2
    Korea Consumer Agency mediation

    For consumer-related disputes including some PI, mediation via KCA or Financial Supervisory Service.

  3. 3
    Court proceedings

    Suit filed in the Civil Court of the relevant District Court.

  4. 4
    Trial

    Bench trial; appellate review through the High Court and Supreme Court.

medical negligence bands · all 15 jurisdictions

Compare to other countries.

How this injury values across the other jurisdictions on the site. Click any country to read the deeper context.

JurisdictionBandAuthority
United States$30,000 – statutory capstate-by-state tort law · jury verdict reporters · statutory caps
United KingdomJudicial College Guidelines (16th ed.)
Ireland€30,000 – €400,000+Personal Injuries Guidelines (Judicial Council)
CanadaAndrews v Grand & Toy non-pecuniary cap
Australiastate-by-state CTP and Civil Liability Acts
Spain€50,000 – €300,000Baremo (Law 35/2015) — mandatory points-based scale
Italy€100,000 – €500,000Tabelle Milanesi (Tribunale di Milano)
Germany€50,000 – €400,000Schmerzensgeldtabelle (Pain & Suffering Tables)
France€100,000 – €500,000Référentiel Mornet · Barème Dalloz
New ZealandAccident Compensation Act 2001 · ACC entitlement schedules
SingaporeS$50,000 – S$500,000Civil Law Act · State Courts and High Court precedent
Hong KongHK$500,000 – HK$3,000,000Personal Injuries List quanta tables · Court of Appeal precedent
Japan¥5,000,000 – ¥30,000,000赤い本 (Akai-bon) · 青本 (Aoi-bon) court-published quantum tables
South Korea· you are here₩50,000,000 – ₩500,000,000Civil Act · Supreme Court of Korea precedent · Hoffman/Leibniz formulae
TaiwanNT$500,000 – NT$5,000,000Civil Code · Supreme Court precedent · Compulsory Auto Liability Insurance Act
S. Korea · medical negligence · frequently asked

Common questions.

Each answer is independently coherent and sourced to the authority documents on this page.

editorial note

Numbers on this page are starting points sourced to Civil Act · Supreme Court of Korea precedent · Hoffman/Leibniz formulae. They are not quotes for any specific case. For representation, consult a solicitor or attorney qualified in South Korea. See /methodology for how each band is derived, /sources for the standing authority list, and /disclaimer for the scope statement.