Fracture settlements
in Michigan.
Two Michigan Supreme Court decisions shape every fracture claim. McCormick, about a worker whose ankle was run over by a truck, set the test for car crash injuries. Kandil-Elsayed in 2023 ended the rule that barred claims over open and obvious hazards.
Facts that decide a fracture claim in Michigan
| Open and obvious hazards | Since 2023 an open and obvious condition is weighed in breach and comparative fault, not used to deny that the owner owed any duty.Kandil-Elsayed v. F & E Oil (Mich. 2023) |
|---|---|
| Fault rule | A plaintiff more than 50% at fault cannot recover noneconomic damages; economic damages are reduced by the plaintiff’s share.MCL 600.2959, as explained in Kandil-Elsayed v. F & E Oil (Mich. 2023) |
| No fault threshold | Pain and suffering after a car crash requires death, permanent serious disfigurement, or a serious impairment of body function: “an objectively manifested impairment of an important body function that affects the person’s general ability to lead his or her normal life.”MCL 500.3135(5), as quoted in Patrick v. Turkelson (Mich. Ct. App. 2018) |
| Deadline to sue | “3 years after the time of the death or injury for all actions to recover damages for the death of a person, or for injury to a person or property.”MCL 600.5805, as quoted in Henry v. Dow Chemical (Mich. Ct. App. 2017) |
| Claims against public bodies | Road defect notice within 120 days; injury claims against the State within 6 months.MCL 691.1404 and 600.6431, in the MyClaimWorth notice of claim chart |