Whiplash settlements
in South Dakota.
South Dakota applies pure comparative negligence under a "slight versus gross" framework — claimant negligence more than slight in comparison to defendant's may bar recovery. For whiplash claims specifically, the band is built from the state-by-state tort law · jury verdict reporters · statutory caps framework and then adjusted for South Dakota's pure comparative negligence and any applicable statutory cap.
South Dakota applies pure comparative negligence, which means a whiplash claimant who is partly responsible for their own injury still recovers — the award is reduced by the percentage of fault attributed to them, but never barred. This is materially more claimant-friendly than the modified or contributory rules in neighbouring jurisdictions, and it shows up in whiplash settlements where comparative fault is contested (the claimant who failed to mitigate, the unbelted occupant, the worker who departed from a safety protocol).
South Dakota's caps (medical malpractice cap) apply to the non-economic component of whiplash damages and can compress upper-tier verdicts. The exact application depends on the cause of action and the head of damage; the caps section on this page sets out each ceiling and the conditions under which it bites.
The US band is the starting point. South Dakota's fault rule and any applicable cap then adjust the figure.