Head & brain settlements
in Oklahoma.
Since Beason in 2019, brain injury awards in Oklahoma are not trimmed by a noneconomic cap. Several of the state’s recent brain injury appeals come from hospital care, where the fight is over how negligence can be proved when the patient cannot say what happened.
Facts that decide a head & brain claim in Oklahoma
| Cap on pain and suffering | The statutory $350,000 noneconomic cap was struck down in 2019 as an unconstitutional special law.Beason v. I. E. Miller Services (Okla. 2019), holding 23 O.S. § 61.2(B)-(F) void |
|---|---|
| Res ipsa loquitur | Raises a rebuttable inference of negligence that lets a plaintiff reach the jury; where the evidence is conflicting, whether it applies is a question for the jury.Smith v. Hines (Okla. 2011), applied in Rogers v. Mercy Health Center (Okla. Civ. App. 2014) |
| COVID-19 immunity | Providers treating during the COVID-19 emergency are immune from ordinary negligence claims under Oklahoma’s COVID-19 liability act; only gross negligence or willful misconduct can proceed.63 O.S. § 6406; Burgess v. Integris Health Edmond (Okla. 2026) |
| Deadline to sue | Two years for an action for injury to the rights of another not arising on contract.12 O.S. § 95(A)(3), as applied in Hough Oilfield Service v. Newton, 2017 OK CIV APP 31 |
| Fault rule | Your own negligence does not bar recovery unless it is of greater degree than the defendants’ negligence, so a 51% share bars you and a smaller share reduces the award.23 O.S. § 13, as quoted in Edwards v. McKee (Okla. Civ. App. 2003) |