Skip to content
MyClaimWorth
VA
★ Virginia · back & spine

Back & spine settlements
in Virginia.

By Reviewed by Abd Shanti, Founder9 min read

Two Supreme Court of Virginia decisions frame spine claims. In one, a driver with a herniated disk won a new trial because the defense experts who said the crash was too light should not have testified. In the other, a $20 million verdict for a spinal injury in a rollover was reversed outright.

Facts that decide a back & spine claim in Virginia

Fault ruleContributory negligence: if your own negligence is a proximate cause of the accident, it bars recovery. Last clear chance does not supersede that rule; a negligent plaintiff may recover only if his negligence was a remote cause.Williams v. Harrison (Va. 1998)
Deadline to sue“[E]very action for personal injuries, whatever the theory of recovery … shall be brought within two years after the cause of action accrues.”Va. Code § 8.01-243(A)
Seat belt useNot wearing a seat belt “shall not constitute negligence, be considered in mitigation of damages of whatever nature, be admissible in evidence or be the subject of comment by counsel” in a motor vehicle injury case.Va. Code § 46.2-1094(D)
★ VA · reported back & spine outcomes

What Virginia courts have awarded.

Real Virginia decisions and verdicts, each linked to the court record or official report.

  • Supreme Court of Virginia · 1996
    Defense verdict reversed; new trial

    Jeffrey Tittsworth was stopped at a parking lot exit in Stafford County when Stephanie Robinson’s car hit the rear of his van after her wet shoe slipped off the clutch. He felt fine at first, but back stiffness began hours later, and a neurosurgeon found a herniated disk at L5-S1 caused by the collision. The defense called a mechanical engineer, who put the force at no more than 1.6 G, and a biomechanics expert to say the crash could not have ruptured the disk. The jury found for Robinson, but the Supreme Court held the testimony was speculative and unreliable and ordered a new trial.

  • Supreme Court of Virginia · 2016
    $20,000,000 verdict reversed; judgment for Mazda

    Shannon Walters swerved to avoid an object that fell from a pickup truck, and her 1995 Mazda Miata rolled over and landed on its top against a tree. She suffered a serious cervical spine injury and could not move her legs. A jury awarded $20 million on the theory that the soft top latches should have held in a rollover. The Supreme Court held Mazda had no duty to design a soft top for rollover protection and entered final judgment for Mazda.

★ VA · back & spine · in practice

What changes the number here.

What actually moves a back & spine settlement in Virginia.

  1. 1

    Challenge low impact experts before trial. Tittsworth won a new trial because the defense “crash too small” testimony lacked a reliable basis.

  2. 2

    A delayed onset of back pain is common and not fatal. Tittsworth told the other driver he was fine and still proved a disk herniation.

  3. 3

    Product claims depend on duty. Walters lost a $20 million verdict because the court held the soft top was never meant to protect in a rollover.

★ VA · statute of limitations
2 years from date of injury

Va. Code § 8.01-243

★ VA · fault rule
Pure contributory negligence

Pure contributory negligence, 1% claimant fault bars all recovery. Virginia retains the rule by long-standing common-law tradition and has resisted both judicial and legislative repeal.

★ VA · caps

What caps recovery.

Statutory caps that may bear on a back & spine settlement in Virginia.

★ back & spine · same region & fault regime

Compare to like jurisdictions.

How Virginia's fault rule and limitation period compare to jurisdictions in the same US region and to those running the same fault rule for back & spine claims.

JurisdictionFault ruleLimitationBack & spine page
Virginia · you are herePure contributory negligence2 years from date of injury—
West VirginiaModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injuryWV · back & spine →
AlabamaPure contributory negligence2 years from date of injuryAL · back & spine →
ArkansasModified comparative, 50% bar3 years for personal injury; 2 years for medical malpracticeAR · back & spine →
FloridaModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injury (was 4; reduced by HB 837)FL · back & spine →
GeorgiaModified comparative, 50% bar2 years from date of injuryGA · back & spine →
KentuckyPure comparative negligence1 year for personal injury (one of the shortest in the US)KY · back & spine →
District of ColumbiaPure contributory negligence3 years from date of injuryDC · back & spine →
MarylandPure contributory negligence3 years from date of injuryMD · back & spine →
North CarolinaPure contributory negligence3 years from date of injuryNC · back & spine →
WashingtonPure comparative negligence3 years from date of injuryWA · back & spine →
WisconsinModified comparative, 51% bar3 years from date of injuryWI · back & spine →
WyomingModified comparative, 51% bar4 years from date of injuryWY · back & spine →
★ VA · back & spine · frequently asked

Common questions.

Each answer is independently coherent and references the relevant statute or authority document.

★ editorial note

Figures on this page are not quotes for any specific case. For representation, consult an attorney admitted in Virginia. See /methodology, /sources, and /disclaimer.