Head & brain settlements
in Washington.
Washington applies pure comparative negligence with a 3-year SOL. The state's non-economic cap was struck down in Sofie v. Fibreboard (1989) on jury-trial grounds and has not been re-imposed. For head & brain claims specifically, the band is built from the state-by-state tort law · jury verdict reporters · statutory caps framework and then adjusted for Washington's pure comparative negligence.
Washington applies pure comparative negligence, which means a head & brain claimant who is partly responsible for their own injury still recovers — the award is reduced by the percentage of fault attributed to them, but never barred. This is materially more claimant-friendly than the modified or contributory rules in neighbouring jurisdictions, and it shows up in head & brain settlements where comparative fault is contested (the claimant who failed to mitigate, the unbelted occupant, the worker who departed from a safety protocol).
Washington does not impose a state-specific statutory cap on the standard heads of damage in head & brain cases. The band is constrained primarily by jury verdict ranges, insurance policy limits, and the strength of the medical paper trail. Catastrophic head & brain claims with documented future care needs can clear the upper end of the band without bumping into a statutory ceiling.
The US band is the starting point. Washington's fault rule and any applicable cap then adjust the figure.