Head & brain settlements
in Arizona.
Arizona applies pure comparative negligence and is one of the few US states whose constitution prohibits statutory caps on personal injury damages. For head & brain claims specifically, the band is built from the state-by-state tort law · jury verdict reporters · statutory caps framework and then adjusted for Arizona's pure comparative negligence and any applicable statutory cap.
Arizona applies pure comparative negligence, which means a head & brain claimant who is partly responsible for their own injury still recovers — the award is reduced by the percentage of fault attributed to them, but never barred. This is materially more claimant-friendly than the modified or contributory rules in neighbouring jurisdictions, and it shows up in head & brain settlements where comparative fault is contested (the claimant who failed to mitigate, the unbelted occupant, the worker who departed from a safety protocol).
Head injury and traumatic brain injury claims sit at the upper end of the US band and are most affected by statutory caps. Arizona's caps (no statutory cap) can compress catastrophic head & brain verdicts even where the underlying damages — future care, lost earning capacity, life-care plan costs — clearly justify the higher figure.
The US band is the starting point. Arizona's fault rule and any applicable cap then adjust the figure.