Skip to content
MyClaimWorth
Japan · workplace

Workplace claim values
in Japan.

By 9 min read

Workers’-compensation and employer-liability claims. Bands on this page are sourced to 赤い本 (Akai-bon) · 青本 (Aoi-bon) court-published quantum tables and reflect the typical settlement values for workplacecases across the relevant severity tiers. The position within a band depends on facts the page can't see — severity, prognosis, recovery time, the strength of medical evidence, and any percentage of fault attributed to the claimant under Japan's comparative-fault rule.

statute of limitations
3 years from knowledge; 20-year longstop

Civil Code art. 724

Limitation runs from the date both the harm and the responsible party were known.

fault allocation
Comparative (過失相殺) — proportional reduction

Civil Code art. 722(2). Strict liability for motor vehicles under the Automobile Liability Security Law (自賠法).

caps that bear on this injury

What caps recovery.

Statutory caps and ceilings that apply to workplace damages in Japan.

Japan · procedural pathway

From injury to settlement.

The steps a workplace claim moves through under Japan law, from medical stability to settlement.

  1. 1
    Insurance negotiation

    Most claims settle directly with the at-fault driver's liability insurer using Akai-bon as the reference.

  2. 2
    JCAA / financial ADR

    Out-of-court ADR through the Japan Center for Settlement of Traffic Accident Disputes (交通事故紛争処理センター).

  3. 3
    Court proceedings

    If ADR fails, suit filed in the Summary Court (≤¥1.4M), District Court (above), or family court depending on parties.

  4. 4
    Trial

    Bench trial; appellate review through the High Court and Supreme Court.

workplace bands · all 15 jurisdictions

Compare to other countries.

How this injury values across the other jurisdictions on the site. Click any country to read the deeper context.

JurisdictionBandAuthority
United Statesstate-by-state tort law · jury verdict reporters · statutory caps
United KingdomJudicial College Guidelines (16th ed.)
IrelandPersonal Injuries Guidelines (Judicial Council)
CanadaAndrews v Grand & Toy non-pecuniary cap
Australiastate-by-state CTP and Civil Liability Acts
SpainBaremo (Law 35/2015) — mandatory points-based scale
ItalyTabelle Milanesi (Tribunale di Milano)
GermanySchmerzensgeldtabelle (Pain & Suffering Tables)
FranceRéférentiel Mornet · Barème Dalloz
New ZealandAccident Compensation Act 2001 · ACC entitlement schedules
SingaporeCivil Law Act · State Courts and High Court precedent
Hong KongPersonal Injuries List quanta tables · Court of Appeal precedent
Japan· you are here赤い本 (Akai-bon) · 青本 (Aoi-bon) court-published quantum tables
South KoreaCivil Act · Supreme Court of Korea precedent · Hoffman/Leibniz formulae
TaiwanCivil Code · Supreme Court precedent · Compulsory Auto Liability Insurance Act
Japan · workplace · frequently asked

Common questions.

Each answer is independently coherent and sourced to the authority documents on this page.

editorial note

Numbers on this page are starting points sourced to 赤い本 (Akai-bon) · 青本 (Aoi-bon) court-published quantum tables. They are not quotes for any specific case. For representation, consult a solicitor or attorney qualified in Japan. See /methodology for how each band is derived, /sources for the standing authority list, and /disclaimer for the scope statement.