Skip to content
MyClaimWorth
AK
★ Alaska · head & brain

Head & brain settlements
in Alaska.

By 9 min read

A man helping a friend hang a crucifix above a staircase fell when the wire broke, suffering broken ribs, a spinal fracture and a traumatic brain injury. The jury valued his noneconomic loss at $1.2 million, twice what he asked, but found him 75% at fault, so he received $300,000. A dancer rehearsing in Sitka was concussed by a falling lantern and lost at trial.

Facts that decide a head & brain claim in Alaska

Fault first, then the capComparative fault is applied to the verdict before the noneconomic cap, so 25% of $1.2 million ($300,000) stood under the $400,000 cap.Kisling v. Grosz (Alaska 2025)
Volunteers at eventsA volunteer who hung the lantern could not be held financially responsible under federal law, and the city was not vicariously liable for him.Sulzbach v. City & Borough of Sitka (Alaska 2022)
Deadline to sueTwo years from accrual for a personal injury claim, head injuries included.Alaska Stat. § 09.10.070(a)
★ band · US federal frame
$500,000 to multi-million
Severe traumatic brain injury
Catastrophic-case reported decisions

The US band is the starting point. Alaska's fault rule and any applicable cap then adjust the figure.

★ AK · reported head & brain outcomes

What Alaska courts have awarded.

Real Alaska decisions and verdicts, each linked to the court record or official report.

  • Alaska Supreme Court · 2025
    $300,000 judgment affirmed

    Paul Grosz stood on a homemade walking plank to help his friend Gregory Kisling hang a crucifix above the stairs in Kisling’s home. The wire broke and Grosz fell with the artwork, suffering broken ribs, a spinal fracture and a traumatic brain injury. The jury found $1.2 million in noneconomic loss and Kisling 25% at fault. The court affirmed $300,000.

  • Alaska Supreme Court · 2022
    Defense verdict affirmed

    During preparations for Sitka’s 2016 Alaska Day celebration at Harrigan Centennial Hall, a volunteer temporarily fastened ten cloth lanterns of about 5.5 pounds each and left for about 15 minutes. One fell and struck Sandy Sulzbach, rehearsing with a dance group, on the head and upper back; she was diagnosed with a concussion. The jury found no negligence; affirmed.

★ AK · head & brain · in practice

What changes the number here.

What actually moves a head & brain settlement in Alaska.

  1. 1

    Your own share of fault can cost more than the cap; document why the hazard was the other side’s.

  2. 2

    Ask for a severe impairment finding if the injury qualifies for the higher cap.

  3. 3

    Sue the group that ran the event, not only the building owner.

★ AK · statute of limitations
2 years from date of injury or discovery

Alaska Stat. § 09.10.070

★ AK · fault rule
Pure comparative negligence

Pure comparative negligence, recovery available even at 99% claimant fault, reduced proportionally.

★ AK · caps

What caps recovery.

Statutory caps that may bear on a head & brain settlement in Alaska.

★ head & brain severity tiers · US frame

How the band stratifies.

The state-by-state tort law · jury verdict reporters · statutory caps stratifies head & brain into the tiers below. Alaska courts apply the same tier structure, adjusted for state-specific factors.

Severity tierBandBasis
Concussion / mild TBI$25,000 to $100,000Reported decisions
Severe traumatic brain injury$500,000 to multi-millionCatastrophic-case reported decisions
★ head & brain · same region & fault regime

Compare to like jurisdictions.

How Alaska's fault rule and limitation period compare to jurisdictions in the same US region and to those running the same fault rule for head & brain claims.

JurisdictionFault ruleLimitationHead & brain page
Alaska · you are herePure comparative negligence2 years from date of injury or discovery—
CaliforniaPure comparative negligence2 years for personal injury; 1 year for medical malpractice (with 3-year repose)CA · head & brain →
ColoradoModified comparative, 50% bar2 years for personal injury; 3 years for motor vehicleCO · head & brain →
HawaiiModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injuryHI · head & brain →
IdahoModified comparative, 50% bar2 years from date of injuryID · head & brain →
MontanaModified comparative, 51% bar3 years from date of injuryMT · head & brain →
NevadaModified comparative, 51% bar2 years for personal injury; 3 years for medical malpracticeNV · head & brain →
ArizonaPure comparative negligence2 years from date of injuryAZ · head & brain →
KentuckyPure comparative negligence1 year for personal injury (one of the shortest in the US)KY · head & brain →
MississippiPure comparative negligence3 years from date of injuryMS · head & brain →
MissouriPure comparative negligence5 years for personal injury; 2 years for medical malpracticeMO · head & brain →
ArkansasModified comparative, 50% bar3 years for personal injury; 2 years for medical malpracticeAR · head & brain →
ConnecticutModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injuryCT · head & brain →
★ AK · head & brain · frequently asked

Common questions.

Each answer is independently coherent and references the relevant statute or authority document.

★ editorial note

Figures on this page are starting points: the US band adjusted for Alaska's statutory framework. They are not quotes for any specific case. For representation, consult an attorney admitted in Alaska. See /methodology, /sources, and /disclaimer.