Idaho applies modified-50 comparative fault with an inflation-adjusted non-economic damages cap of roughly $500,000. For fracture claims specifically, the band is built from the state-by-state tort law · jury verdict reporters · statutory caps framework and then adjusted for Idaho's modified comparative — 50% bar and any applicable statutory cap.
★ band · US federal frame
$15,000 – $80,000
Wrist or arm fracture
Settlement aggregates
The US band is the starting point. Idaho's fault rule and any applicable cap then adjust the figure.
★ ID · statute of limitations
2 years from date of injury
Idaho Code § 5-219
★ ID · fault rule
Modified comparative — 50% bar
Modified comparative — recovery barred at 50% claimant fault.
★ ID · caps
What caps recovery.
Statutory caps that may bear on a fracture settlement in Idaho.
Non-economic damages cap
Personal injury
~$500,000, inflation-adjusted
Idaho Code § 6-1603
★ fracture · neighbouring jurisdictions
Compare to neighbours.
How Idaho's fault rule and limitation period compare to other US jurisdictions for fracture claims.
Each answer is independently coherent and references the relevant statute or authority document.
How much is a fracture claim worth in Idaho?
Idaho fracture settlements track the federal US band of $15,000 – $80,000, adjusted for Idaho's fault rule (modified comparative — 50% bar) and any applicable state cap. The position within the band turns on severity, prognosis, recovery time, and the strength of the medical paper trail.
What fault rule applies to fracture claims in Idaho?
Modified comparative — 50% bar. Modified comparative — recovery barred at 50% claimant fault.
What is the statute of limitations for fracture claims in Idaho?
2 years from date of injury. Source: Idaho Code § 5-219. Filing after the period expires generally bars the claim absent a tolling exception.
Do Idaho's damages caps reduce fracture settlements?
Yes — Idaho applies the following caps that may bear on a fracture claim: Non-economic damages cap. Caps are applied to the gross award before any fault-allocation reduction.
Does Idaho require no-fault first-party recovery for auto-related fracture claims?
No. Idaho is a traditional tort jurisdiction; the at-fault driver's insurer is the primary source of recovery for auto-related fracture claims.
Should I hire a Idaho fracture attorney?
For all but the most modest claims, yes. Idaho's fault rule and caps materially affect the calculus, and adjusters value represented claims significantly higher. Most Idaho personal injury attorneys work on contingency (33–40% typical), with no fee unless you recover.
Figures on this page are starting points: the US band adjusted for Idaho's statutory framework. They are not quotes for any specific case. For representation, consult an attorney admitted in Idaho. See /methodology, /sources, and /disclaimer.