Fracture settlements
in Alaska.
Alaska applies pure comparative negligence with a statutory cap of $400,000 on non-economic damages, rising to $1M for severe permanent injury. For fracture claims specifically, the band is built from the state-by-state tort law · jury verdict reporters · statutory caps framework and then adjusted for Alaska's pure comparative negligence and any applicable statutory cap.
Alaska applies pure comparative negligence, which means a fracture claimant who is partly responsible for their own injury still recovers — the award is reduced by the percentage of fault attributed to them, but never barred. This is materially more claimant-friendly than the modified or contributory rules in neighbouring jurisdictions, and it shows up in fracture settlements where comparative fault is contested (the claimant who failed to mitigate, the unbelted occupant, the worker who departed from a safety protocol).
Alaska's caps (non-economic damages cap, punitive damages cap) apply to the non-economic component of fracture damages and can compress upper-tier verdicts. The exact application depends on the cause of action and the head of damage; the caps section on this page sets out each ceiling and the conditions under which it bites.
The US band is the starting point. Alaska's fault rule and any applicable cap then adjust the figure.