Skip to content
MyClaimWorth
IN
★ Indiana · back & spine

Back & spine settlements
in Indiana.

By Reviewed by Abd Shanti, Founder9 min read

An old back injury does not cap an Indiana claim if you recovered from it. A homemaker with a prior disc herniation at L5-S1 won $2,727,958 after a highway rollover, and the Court of Appeals affirmed.

Facts that decide a back & spine claim in Indiana

Prior injuriesEvidence that the plaintiff had fully recovered from an earlier back injury and led an active life supports damages for the new harm.Berman v. Cannon (Ind. Ct. App. 2007)
Lost earning capacityA plaintiff who was not employed can still recover for lost earning capacity and household services when an economist gives a supported estimate.Berman v. Cannon (Ind. Ct. App. 2007)
Deadline to sueAn action for injury to person “must be commenced within two (2) years after the cause of action accrues.”Ind. Code § 34-11-2-4, as quoted in Stone v. Wright (Ind. Ct. App. 2019)
Fault ruleIf the claimant’s fault is greater than 50% of the total fault, the jury must return a verdict for the defendant; at exactly 50% or less, damages are reduced by the claimant’s share.Ind. Code § 34-51-2-7(b)(2), as quoted in Evansville Automotive v. Fritchley (Ind. Ct. App. 2023)
Seat belt useSince 1 July 2024, nonuse can reduce damages as a failure to mitigate for claimants 15 or older, but it is not evidence of fault.Ind. Code § 9-19-10-7 (HEA 1090, 2024), in the MyClaimWorth seat belt chart
★ IN · reported back & spine outcomes

What Indiana courts have awarded.

Real Indiana decisions and verdicts, each linked to the court record or official report.

  • Court of Appeals of Indiana · 2007
    $2,727,958.40 verdict, affirmed

    In 1995 Harvey Berman’s car struck the Cannons’ van on I-65, sending it into the median where it rolled. Rhonda Cannon was knocked unconscious and later complained of pain in her lower back and leg. She had an L5-S1 disc herniation from a 1991 fall but testified she had fully recovered, doing yard work, painting and camping. The jury found Berman 100% at fault and awarded her $2,727,958.40 and her husband $122,755. The Court of Appeals rejected the claim that the award was excessive.

★ IN · back & spine · in practice

What changes the number here.

What actually moves a back & spine settlement in Indiana.

  1. 1

    Show the life you had before. Berman turned on proof that Rhonda Cannon had recovered from her earlier herniation and was active, which let the jury attribute her later disability to the crash.

  2. 2

    Economic experts matter even for people outside the workforce. The economist in Berman estimated lost wages between $195,126 and $738,921 if she had worked, plus the value of household services.

  3. 3

    A large verdict survives when the evidence supports each part. The Court of Appeals reviewed the lost earning capacity and household services figures and let the award stand.

★ IN · statute of limitations
2 years from date of injury

Ind. Code § 34-11-2-4

★ IN · fault rule
Modified comparative, 51% bar

Modified comparative, recovery barred at 51% claimant fault.

★ IN · caps

What caps recovery.

Statutory caps that may bear on a back & spine settlement in Indiana.

★ back & spine · same region & fault regime

Compare to like jurisdictions.

How Indiana's fault rule and limitation period compare to jurisdictions in the same US region and to those running the same fault rule for back & spine claims.

JurisdictionFault ruleLimitationBack & spine page
Indiana · you are hereModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injury—
IowaModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injuryIA · back & spine →
KansasModified comparative, 50% bar2 years from date of injuryKS · back & spine →
MichiganModified comparative, 51% bar3 years from date of injuryMI · back & spine →
MinnesotaModified comparative, 51% bar6 years for personal injury (uncommonly long); 4 years for medical malpracticeMN · back & spine →
MissouriPure comparative negligence5 years for personal injury; 2 years for medical malpracticeMO · back & spine →
NebraskaModified comparative, 50% bar4 years for personal injury; 2 years for medical malpracticeNE · back & spine →
LouisianaModified comparative, 51% bar1 year (la prescription), extended to 2 years by Act 423 (2024) for tort claims accruing on or after July 1, 2024LA · back & spine →
MassachusettsModified comparative, 51% bar3 years from date of injuryMA · back & spine →
MontanaModified comparative, 51% bar3 years from date of injuryMT · back & spine →
NevadaModified comparative, 51% bar2 years for personal injury; 3 years for medical malpracticeNV · back & spine →
KentuckyPure comparative negligence1 year for personal injury (one of the shortest in the US)KY · back & spine →
MaineModified comparative, 50% bar6 years for personal injury, longest in the USME · back & spine →
★ IN · back & spine · frequently asked

Common questions.

Each answer is independently coherent and references the relevant statute or authority document.

★ editorial note

Figures on this page are not quotes for any specific case. For representation, consult an attorney admitted in Indiana. See /methodology, /sources, and /disclaimer.