Back & spine settlements
in Massachusetts.
Massachusetts applies modified-51 comparative fault with a full no-fault auto scheme and a $500,000 medical-malpractice cap. For back & spine claims specifically, the band is built from the state-by-state tort law · jury verdict reporters · statutory caps framework and then adjusted for Massachusetts's modified comparative — 51% bar and any applicable statutory cap.
Massachusetts applies modified comparative negligence with a 51% bar. A back & spine claimant who is 50% at fault still recovers 50% of damages; one assigned 51% recovers nothing. This is slightly more claimant-friendly than the 50% bar applied in some neighbouring states, and it leaves room for negotiation in mixed-liability back & spine cases where the comparative-fault split is close to even.
Massachusetts's caps (medical malpractice cap) apply to the non-economic component of back & spine damages and can compress upper-tier verdicts. The exact application depends on the cause of action and the head of damage; the caps section on this page sets out each ceiling and the conditions under which it bites.
Because Massachusetts is a no-fault auto insurance state, back & spine claims arising from motor-vehicle accidents are first routed through Personal Injury Protection (PIP) coverage. Tort recovery against the at-fault driver is gated by the state's serious-injury threshold, which materially limits the lower end of the back & spine settlement band. Mandatory PIP under M.G.L. c. 90, § 34A. Tort recovery for pain and suffering only above the serious-injury threshold ($2,000 medical bills or specified injury types).
The US band is the starting point. Massachusetts's fault rule and any applicable cap then adjust the figure.