Skip to content
MyClaimWorth
MD
Maryland · fracture

Fracture settlements
in Maryland.

By 6 min read

Maryland applies pure contributory negligence — 1% claimant fault bars recovery — combined with an inflation-indexed cap on non-economic damages currently around $935,000. For fracture claims specifically, the band is built from the state-by-state tort law · jury verdict reporters · statutory caps framework and then adjusted for Maryland's pure contributory negligence and any applicable statutory cap.

Maryland retains pure contributory negligence — one of only a handful of US jurisdictions that has not abolished the rule. For fracture claims, this means any percentage of claimant fault, however small, bars recovery entirely. The rule converts mixed-liability fracture cases into binary outcomes and gives defendants and their insurers substantial settlement leverage. Plaintiffs' counsel here typically focus heavily on framing the claimant's conduct as faultless before damages are even discussed.

Maryland's caps (non-economic damages cap (general), medical malpractice cap) apply to the non-economic component of fracture damages and can compress upper-tier verdicts. The exact application depends on the cause of action and the head of damage; the caps section on this page sets out each ceiling and the conditions under which it bites.

band · US federal frame
$15,000 – $80,000
Wrist or arm fracture
Settlement aggregates

The US band is the starting point. Maryland's fault rule and any applicable cap then adjust the figure.

MD · statute of limitations
3 years from date of injury

Md. Code, Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 5-101

MD · fault rule
Pure contributory negligence

Pure contributory negligence — 1% claimant fault bars all recovery. Maryland is one of only five US jurisdictions retaining this rule and confirmed it most recently in Coleman v. Soccer Association of Columbia (2013).

MD · caps

What caps recovery.

Statutory caps that may bear on a fracture settlement in Maryland.

fracture · same region & fault regime

Compare to like jurisdictions.

How Maryland's fault rule and limitation period compare to jurisdictions in the same US region and to those running the same fault rule for fracture claims.

JurisdictionFault ruleLimitationFracture page
Maryland · you are herePure contributory negligence3 years from date of injury
MassachusettsModified comparative — 51% bar3 years from date of injuryMA · fracture
New HampshireModified comparative — 51% bar3 years from date of injuryNH · fracture
New JerseyModified comparative — 51% bar2 years from date of injuryNJ · fracture
New YorkPure comparative negligence3 years for personal injury; 2 years 6 months for medical malpracticeNY · fracture
PennsylvaniaModified comparative — 51% bar2 years from date of injuryPA · fracture
Rhode IslandPure comparative negligence3 years from date of injuryRI · fracture
North CarolinaPure contributory negligence3 years from date of injuryNC · fracture
VirginiaPure contributory negligence2 years from date of injuryVA · fracture
AlabamaPure contributory negligence2 years from date of injuryAL · fracture
District of ColumbiaPure contributory negligence3 years from date of injuryDC · fracture
MichiganModified comparative — 51% bar3 years from date of injuryMI · fracture
MinnesotaModified comparative — 51% bar6 years for personal injury (uncommonly long); 4 years for medical malpracticeMN · fracture
MD · fracture · frequently asked

Common questions.

Each answer is independently coherent and references the relevant statute or authority document.

editorial note

Figures on this page are starting points: the US band adjusted for Maryland's statutory framework. They are not quotes for any specific case. For representation, consult an attorney admitted in Maryland. See /methodology, /sources, and /disclaimer.