Fracture settlements
in Minnesota.
Minnesota applies modified-51 comparative fault with a six-year personal-injury statute of limitations — uncommonly long for the United States. For fracture claims specifically, the band is built from the state-by-state tort law · jury verdict reporters · statutory caps framework and then adjusted for Minnesota's modified comparative — 51% bar.
Minnesota applies modified comparative negligence with a 51% bar. A fracture claimant who is 50% at fault still recovers 50% of damages; one assigned 51% recovers nothing. This is slightly more claimant-friendly than the 50% bar applied in some neighbouring states, and it leaves room for negotiation in mixed-liability fracture cases where the comparative-fault split is close to even.
Minnesota does not impose a state-specific statutory cap on the standard heads of damage in fracture cases. The band is constrained primarily by jury verdict ranges, insurance policy limits, and the strength of the medical paper trail. Catastrophic fracture claims with documented future care needs can clear the upper end of the band without bumping into a statutory ceiling.
The US band is the starting point. Minnesota's fault rule and any applicable cap then adjust the figure.