Skip to content
MyClaimWorth
NC
North Carolina · fracture

Fracture settlements
in North Carolina.

By 6 min read

North Carolina applies pure contributory negligence — 1% claimant fault bars recovery — softened in some cases by the last-clear-chance doctrine. For fracture claims specifically, the band is built from the state-by-state tort law · jury verdict reporters · statutory caps framework and then adjusted for North Carolina's pure contributory negligence and any applicable statutory cap.

North Carolina retains pure contributory negligence — one of only a handful of US jurisdictions that has not abolished the rule. For fracture claims, this means any percentage of claimant fault, however small, bars recovery entirely. The rule converts mixed-liability fracture cases into binary outcomes and gives defendants and their insurers substantial settlement leverage. Plaintiffs' counsel here typically focus heavily on framing the claimant's conduct as faultless before damages are even discussed.

North Carolina's caps (non-economic damages cap (med-mal), punitive damages cap) apply to the non-economic component of fracture damages and can compress upper-tier verdicts. The exact application depends on the cause of action and the head of damage; the caps section on this page sets out each ceiling and the conditions under which it bites.

band · US federal frame
$15,000 – $80,000
Wrist or arm fracture
Settlement aggregates

The US band is the starting point. North Carolina's fault rule and any applicable cap then adjust the figure.

NC · statute of limitations
3 years from date of injury

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-52

NC · fault rule
Pure contributory negligence

Pure contributory negligence — 1% claimant fault bars recovery. North Carolina retains the rule by judicial decision and has resisted legislative repeal.

NC · caps

What caps recovery.

Statutory caps that may bear on a fracture settlement in North Carolina.

fracture · neighbouring jurisdictions

Compare to neighbours.

How North Carolina's fault rule and limitation period compare to other US jurisdictions for fracture claims.

JurisdictionFault ruleLimitationFracture page
North Carolina · you are herePure contributory negligence3 years from date of injury
AlabamaPure contributory negligence2 years from date of injuryAL · fracture
AlaskaPure comparative negligence2 years from date of injury or discoveryAK · fracture
ArizonaPure comparative negligence2 years from date of injuryAZ · fracture
ArkansasModified comparative — 50% bar3 years for personal injury; 2 years for medical malpracticeAR · fracture
CaliforniaPure comparative negligence2 years for personal injury; 1 year for medical malpractice (with 3-year repose)CA · fracture
ColoradoModified comparative — 50% bar2 years for personal injury; 3 years for motor vehicleCO · fracture
ConnecticutModified comparative — 51% bar2 years from date of injuryCT · fracture
DelawareModified comparative — 51% bar2 years from date of injuryDE · fracture
District of ColumbiaPure contributory negligence3 years from date of injuryDC · fracture
FloridaModified comparative — 51% bar2 years from date of injury (was 4; reduced by HB 837)FL · fracture
GeorgiaModified comparative — 50% bar2 years from date of injuryGA · fracture
HawaiiModified comparative — 51% bar2 years from date of injuryHI · fracture
NC · fracture · frequently asked

Common questions.

Each answer is independently coherent and references the relevant statute or authority document.

editorial note

Figures on this page are starting points: the US band adjusted for North Carolina's statutory framework. They are not quotes for any specific case. For representation, consult an attorney admitted in North Carolina. See /methodology, /sources, and /disclaimer.