Fracture settlements
in Nevada.
Nevada’s leading premises case began with a shopper tripping over a pallet at Costco. The Supreme Court held that an obvious hazard does not automatically clear the owner; the question is whether the owner acted reasonably and should have anticipated the harm.
Facts that decide a fracture claim in Nevada
| Obvious hazards | A landowner still owes a duty of reasonable care where it should anticipate harm despite the hazard being open and obvious; the plaintiff’s own care goes to comparative negligence.Foster v. Costco Wholesale (Nev. 2012) |
|---|---|
| Fault rule | Recovery is barred only if your negligence is greater than the defendants’.NRS 41.141 |
| Deadline to sue | Two years from the injury.NRS 11.190(4)(e) |
| Surveillance evidence | Video of you moving freely outside court can be shown to contradict how you present at trial.Cox v. MGM Grand Hotel (Nev. 2022) |
| Falls on public property | Damages against the state or a local government are capped at $200,000 per claimant.NRS 41.035, in the MyClaimWorth notice of claim chart |