Skip to content
MyClaimWorth
NV
★ Nevada · medical negligence

Medical negligence settlements
in Nevada.

By Reviewed by Abd Shanti, Founder9 min read

Nevada malpractice cases are shaped by a 2004 ballot measure, Keep Our Doctors in Nevada. It capped noneconomic damages, made each provider liable only for its own share, and sits alongside a strict rule that the complaint must come with an expert affidavit.

Facts that decide a medical negligence claim in Nevada

Expert affidavitA malpractice complaint must be filed with a supporting medical expert affidavit. A complaint without a proper one cannot be fixed by amendment and is dismissed.NRS 41A.071; De Becker v. UHS of Delaware (Nev. 2024); Monk v. Ching (Nev. 2023)
Noneconomic capThe 2004 law set the cap at $350,000, and the Supreme Court upheld it against a jury trial challenge. The limit has since changed, and the Nevada Supreme Court publishes the current figure.NRS 41A.035; Tam v. Eighth Judicial District Court (Nev. 2015)
Several liabilityEach health care provider pays only its own share of fault, and may point to the fault of providers who settled.NRS 41A.045; Piroozi (Nev. 2015)
Deadline to sueRecent amendments extend the deadline for some claims to two years after the injury is or should have been discovered.NRS 41A.097, as noted in Boman v. Elkanich (Nev. 2024)
The cap and professional entitiesThe Supreme Court addressed in 2024 whether the cap applies to a doctor’s professional corporation as well as the doctor.Nevins v. Martyn (Nev. 2024)
★ NV · reported medical negligence outcomes

What Nevada courts have awarded.

Real Nevada decisions and verdicts, each linked to the court record or official report.

  • Nevada Supreme Court · 2024
    Judgment on the verdict affirmed

    During surgery on a fracture of the upper arm near the elbow, a burn to the radial nerve left the patient with permanent radial nerve palsy. After a first trial was set aside for juror misconduct, the patient offered to settle for $1,000,000 and then $750,000, and the defense refused. The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment on the second verdict, after addressing the res ipsa loquitur instruction given at trial.

  • Nevada Supreme Court · 2015
    Cap of $350,000 upheld

    The Supreme Court held the noneconomic damages cap in NRS 41A.035 does not violate the right to a jury trial, and decided how it applies across multiple causes of action.

★ NV · medical negligence · in practice

What changes the number here.

What actually moves a medical negligence settlement in Nevada.

  1. 1

    File the affidavit with the complaint, and get it right. De Becker confirms that a complaint with a deficient expert affidavit cannot be cured by amendment. Monk lost claims against three defendants on that ground.

  2. 2

    The cap and several liability together limit what one provider pays for pain and suffering. The real negotiation in a serious Nevada malpractice case is often over economic losses and over which providers carry what share.

  3. 3

    Offers of judgment matter. In Nevins the patient offered to settle for $1,000,000 and then $750,000, the defense rejected both, and the verdict was affirmed, which can expose the defense to fees and costs under Nevada’s offer rules.

★ NV · statute of limitations
2 years for personal injury; 3 years for medical malpractice

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 11.190

★ NV · fault rule
Modified comparative, 51% bar

Modified comparative, recovery barred at 51% claimant fault.

★ NV · caps

What caps recovery.

Statutory caps that may bear on a medical negligence settlement in Nevada.

★ medical negligence · same region & fault regime

Compare to like jurisdictions.

How Nevada's fault rule and limitation period compare to jurisdictions in the same US region and to those running the same fault rule for medical negligence claims.

JurisdictionFault ruleLimitationMedical negligence page
Nevada · you are hereModified comparative, 51% bar2 years for personal injury; 3 years for medical malpractice—
OregonModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injuryOR · medical negligence →
UtahModified comparative, 50% bar4 years for personal injury; 2 years for medical malpracticeUT · medical negligence →
WashingtonPure comparative negligence3 years from date of injuryWA · medical negligence →
WyomingModified comparative, 51% bar4 years from date of injuryWY · medical negligence →
AlaskaPure comparative negligence2 years from date of injury or discoveryAK · medical negligence →
CaliforniaPure comparative negligence2 years for personal injury; 1 year for medical malpractice (with 3-year repose)CA · medical negligence →
New HampshireModified comparative, 51% bar3 years from date of injuryNH · medical negligence →
New JerseyModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injuryNJ · medical negligence →
OhioModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injuryOH · medical negligence →
OklahomaModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injuryOK · medical negligence →
New MexicoPure comparative negligence3 years from date of injuryNM · medical negligence →
New YorkPure comparative negligence3 years for personal injury; 2 years 6 months for medical malpracticeNY · medical negligence →
★ NV · medical negligence · frequently asked

Common questions.

Each answer is independently coherent and references the relevant statute or authority document.

★ editorial note

Figures on this page are not quotes for any specific case. For representation, consult an attorney admitted in Nevada. See /methodology, /sources, and /disclaimer.