Skip to content
MyClaimWorth
AK
★ Alaska · back & spine

Back & spine settlements
in Alaska.

By 9 min read

A man hurt in a December 2008 crash had disc replacement surgery and won $1,458,430 at a second trial, but the Supreme Court ordered a third because the jury never heard that he was assaulted after surgery. A Skagway tenant whose outside stair crumbled underfoot had spinal surgery, and the jury found her landlord not negligent.

Facts that decide a back & spine claim in Alaska

Later injuries matterEvidence of a later assault that may have worsened your back can go to the jury; excluding all of it cost Thompson his verdict.Cooper v. Thompson (Alaska 2015)
Losing side pays feesAlaska Civil Rule 82 lets the winner recover part of its attorney’s fees; Heynen was ordered to pay about $9,770 plus costs.Heynen v. Fairbanks (Alaska 2013)
Deadline to sueAn action for personal injury must be “commenced within two years of the accrual of the cause of action.”Alaska Stat. § 09.10.070(a)
★ band · US federal frame
$80,000 to $400,000+
Back injury (severe, surgery)
Reported decisions; statutory cap states constrain the upper end

The US band is the starting point. Alaska's fault rule and any applicable cap then adjust the figure.

★ AK · reported back & spine outcomes

What Alaska courts have awarded.

Real Alaska decisions and verdicts, each linked to the court record or official report.

  • Alaska Supreme Court · 2015
    $1,458,430 verdict reversed; new trial

    In December 2008 Michael Cooper, whose employer was Central Plumbing & Heating, caused a crash that injured Samuel Thompson. Thompson had neck and lower back pain and disc replacement surgery in May 2009. At the second trial the jury awarded $1,458,430. The court reversed because the trial judge excluded all evidence that Thompson’s girlfriend assaulted him after the surgery.

  • Alaska Supreme Court · 2013
    Defense verdict affirmed

    On October 21, 2006, Elizabeth Heynen stepped out of her second floor apartment in Skagway to walk her dog; she said the edge of the first wooden step crumbled and she fell backward onto her lower spine. She later had spinal surgery. She sued the landlord who sublet her the unit. The jury found no negligence; affirmed, with fees and costs against her.

★ AK · back & spine · in practice

What changes the number here.

What actually moves a back & spine settlement in Alaska.

  1. 1

    Tell your lawyer about every later injury; hiding one can undo a verdict.

  2. 2

    Weigh Rule 82 fee exposure before trial; in Alaska the loser pays part of the other side’s fees.

  3. 3

    Photograph a broken stair or step before it is repaired.

★ AK · statute of limitations
2 years from date of injury or discovery

Alaska Stat. § 09.10.070

★ AK · fault rule
Pure comparative negligence

Pure comparative negligence, recovery available even at 99% claimant fault, reduced proportionally.

★ AK · caps

What caps recovery.

Statutory caps that may bear on a back & spine settlement in Alaska.

★ back & spine severity tiers · US frame

How the band stratifies.

The state-by-state tort law · jury verdict reporters · statutory caps stratifies back & spine into the tiers below. Alaska courts apply the same tier structure, adjusted for state-specific factors.

Severity tierBandBasis
Back injury (moderate, no surgery)$30,000 to $100,000Reported decisions plus settlement aggregates
Back injury (severe, surgery)$80,000 to $400,000+Reported decisions; statutory cap states constrain the upper end
★ back & spine · same region & fault regime

Compare to like jurisdictions.

How Alaska's fault rule and limitation period compare to jurisdictions in the same US region and to those running the same fault rule for back & spine claims.

JurisdictionFault ruleLimitationBack & spine page
Alaska · you are herePure comparative negligence2 years from date of injury or discovery—
CaliforniaPure comparative negligence2 years for personal injury; 1 year for medical malpractice (with 3-year repose)CA · back & spine →
ColoradoModified comparative, 50% bar2 years for personal injury; 3 years for motor vehicleCO · back & spine →
HawaiiModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injuryHI · back & spine →
IdahoModified comparative, 50% bar2 years from date of injuryID · back & spine →
MontanaModified comparative, 51% bar3 years from date of injuryMT · back & spine →
NevadaModified comparative, 51% bar2 years for personal injury; 3 years for medical malpracticeNV · back & spine →
ArizonaPure comparative negligence2 years from date of injuryAZ · back & spine →
KentuckyPure comparative negligence1 year for personal injury (one of the shortest in the US)KY · back & spine →
MississippiPure comparative negligence3 years from date of injuryMS · back & spine →
MissouriPure comparative negligence5 years for personal injury; 2 years for medical malpracticeMO · back & spine →
ArkansasModified comparative, 50% bar3 years for personal injury; 2 years for medical malpracticeAR · back & spine →
ConnecticutModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injuryCT · back & spine →
★ AK · back & spine · frequently asked

Common questions.

Each answer is independently coherent and references the relevant statute or authority document.

★ editorial note

Figures on this page are starting points: the US band adjusted for Alaska's statutory framework. They are not quotes for any specific case. For representation, consult an attorney admitted in Alaska. See /methodology, /sources, and /disclaimer.