Skip to content
MyClaimWorth
AZ
★ Arizona · back & spine

Back & spine settlements
in Arizona.

By Reviewed by Abd Shanti, Founder9 min read

Two Arizona back cases show how much turns on medical opinions. A man sent home after a fall with a spinal fracture nobody caught later suffered a spinal cord injury, and his family’s claims survived his death. A cement worker with two earlier back surgeries learned that a new injury may be treated as only a temporary aggravation.

Facts that decide a back & spine claim in Arizona

If the injured person diesDeath ends the claim for lost enjoyment of life, but the estate can still recover economic damages, and the spouse’s and children’s consortium claims continue; a minor child’s consortium deadline waits until age 18.Martin v. Staheli (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019)
Fault rulePure comparative fault: if the jury finds you partly at fault, “the claimant’s action is not barred, but the full damages shall be reduced in proportion” to your share.A.R.S. § 12-2505(A)
Deadline to sueTwo years after the cause of action accrues for injuries to the person, including medical malpractice.A.R.S. § 12-542
No damages caps“No law shall be enacted in this state limiting the amount of damages to be recovered for causing the death or injury of any person.”Ariz. Const. art. 2, § 31
★ AZ · reported back & spine outcomes

What Arizona courts have awarded.

Real Arizona decisions and verdicts, each linked to the court record or official report.

  • Arizona Court of Appeals · 2019
    Dismissal reversed

    Bradford Martin went to an emergency department after a fall in August 2014, was read as stable on x-ray and sent home. Three days later he felt his back “drop” or “break,” and a profound fracture at T12-L1 was confirmed; the family alleged the missed diagnosis led to a serious spinal cord injury and nursing home care. Martin died while the case was pending. The court held his wife’s and child’s consortium claims and the estate’s economic damages survived, and reversed the dismissal.

  • Arizona Court of Appeals · 2014
    Temporary aggravation finding affirmed

    A Cemex worker of more than twenty years had two surgeries for an L4-5 herniation after a 1990 injury and returned to work with a 10 percent impairment. In May 2010 he hurt his back again; the claim was accepted, then closed after an independent medical examination, and he protested. The ALJ found the new injury caused only a temporary aggravation of an L5-S1 disc protrusion, relying on the carrier’s examiner, and the court held that testimony was enough and affirmed.

★ AZ · back & spine · in practice

What changes the number here.

What actually moves a back & spine settlement in Arizona.

  1. 1

    A missed fracture is a malpractice claim of its own. Martin’s case turned on an x-ray read as stable.

  2. 2

    Family claims can outlive the injured person. Consortium and economic loss claims continued after Martin died.

  3. 3

    Prior back surgery invites the temporary aggravation argument. Get your treating surgeon’s opinion on record.

  4. 4

    Keep the imaging. Martin’s claim rested on what the first x-ray showed and what further imaging would have found before he was discharged.

  5. 5

    Nursing home and lifetime care costs belong in the economic damages claim, which the estate can pursue even after death.

★ AZ · statute of limitations
2 years from date of injury

A.R.S. § 12-542

★ AZ · fault rule
Pure comparative negligence

Pure comparative negligence, recovery available at any fault percentage, reduced proportionally. The Arizona Constitution prohibits caps on damages in death or personal injury actions.

★ AZ · caps

What caps recovery.

Statutory caps that may bear on a back & spine settlement in Arizona.

★ back & spine · same region & fault regime

Compare to like jurisdictions.

How Arizona's fault rule and limitation period compare to jurisdictions in the same US region and to those running the same fault rule for back & spine claims.

JurisdictionFault ruleLimitationBack & spine page
Arizona · you are herePure comparative negligence2 years from date of injury—
New MexicoPure comparative negligence3 years from date of injuryNM · back & spine →
OklahomaModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injuryOK · back & spine →
CaliforniaPure comparative negligence2 years for personal injury; 1 year for medical malpractice (with 3-year repose)CA · back & spine →
KentuckyPure comparative negligence1 year for personal injury (one of the shortest in the US)KY · back & spine →
MississippiPure comparative negligence3 years from date of injuryMS · back & spine →
MissouriPure comparative negligence5 years for personal injury; 2 years for medical malpracticeMO · back & spine →
ArkansasModified comparative, 50% bar3 years for personal injury; 2 years for medical malpracticeAR · back & spine →
ColoradoModified comparative, 50% bar2 years for personal injury; 3 years for motor vehicleCO · back & spine →
ConnecticutModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injuryCT · back & spine →
DelawareModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injuryDE · back & spine →
District of ColumbiaPure contributory negligence3 years from date of injuryDC · back & spine →
FloridaModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injury (was 4; reduced by HB 837)FL · back & spine →
★ AZ · back & spine · frequently asked

Common questions.

Each answer is independently coherent and references the relevant statute or authority document.

★ editorial note

Figures on this page are not quotes for any specific case. For representation, consult an attorney admitted in Arizona. See /methodology, /sources, and /disclaimer.