Skip to content
MyClaimWorth
IL
★ Illinois · fracture

Fracture settlements
in Illinois.

By Reviewed by Abd Shanti, Founder9 min read

Illinois fall cases often turn on whether the hazard was open and obvious. A woman who broke her foot on a Chicago street lost for that reason, while another who broke her wrist tripping over a hose won a new trial.

Facts that decide a fracture claim in Illinois

Open and obvious hazardsWhere the physical condition is undisputed and would be seen by a reasonable person, a court can find it open and obvious as a matter of law and end the case.Ballog v. City of Chicago (Ill. App. 2012)
Suing a city or countyNo action may be brought against a local public entity or its employees unless it is “commenced within one year from the date that the injury was received or the cause of action accrued.”745 ILCS 10/8-101(a), as quoted in Harvest Church v. City of East St. Louis (Ill. App. 2011)
Fault ruleYou are barred only if your contributory fault is more than 50% of the proximate cause of the injury; otherwise the award is reduced by your share.735 ILCS 5/2-1116, as explained in Gratzle v. Sears, Roebuck (Ill. App. 1993)
Deadline to sueTwo years: injury actions “shall be commenced within 2 years next after the cause of action accrued.”735 ILCS 5/13-202, as quoted in Mickiewicz v. Generations at Regency (Ill. App. 2020)
Claims against the StateOne year in the Court of Claims, with a cap of $2,629,104 in 2026 that does not apply to state vehicle crashes.705 ILCS 505/8 and 505/22-1, in the MyClaimWorth notice of claim chart
★ IL · reported fracture outcomes

What Illinois courts have awarded.

Real Illinois decisions and verdicts, each linked to the court record or official report.

  • Illinois Appellate Court, First District · 2006
    Defense verdict reversed, new trial

    A resident tripped over a pneumatic hose lying across a drive she had used countless times and was admitted to hospital with multiple fractures of her left wrist, a dislocated right shoulder, and a facial fracture. The jury found for the building owner and manager, but the appeals court reversed and ordered a new trial because of trial errors.

  • Illinois Appellate Court, First District · 2012
    Summary judgment for the city affirmed

    A woman fractured her right foot when she tripped stepping from a section of street that had been excavated and refilled but not resurfaced. The court held the condition was open and obvious as a matter of law and affirmed judgment for the city.

★ IL · fracture · in practice

What changes the number here.

What actually moves a fracture settlement in Illinois.

  1. 1

    Show why the hazard was not obvious. Ballog lost because the gap was plainly visible and nothing covered it. A hose across a familiar path, as in Simich, is a different kind of danger.

  2. 2

    Document every injury from the fall. The Simich plaintiff had wrist fractures, a shoulder dislocation and a facial fracture, and each adds to the value if liability is proven.

  3. 3

    Falls on city property have a one year deadline under the Tort Immunity Act, half the usual time.

★ IL · statute of limitations
2 years from date of injury

735 ILCS 5/13-202

★ IL · fault rule
Modified comparative, 51% bar

Modified comparative, recovery barred at 51% claimant fault.

★ fracture · same region & fault regime

Compare to like jurisdictions.

How Illinois's fault rule and limitation period compare to jurisdictions in the same US region and to those running the same fault rule for fracture claims.

JurisdictionFault ruleLimitationFracture page
Illinois · you are hereModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injury—
IndianaModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injuryIN · fracture →
IowaModified comparative, 51% bar2 years from date of injuryIA · fracture →
KansasModified comparative, 50% bar2 years from date of injuryKS · fracture →
MichiganModified comparative, 51% bar3 years from date of injuryMI · fracture →
MinnesotaModified comparative, 51% bar6 years for personal injury (uncommonly long); 4 years for medical malpracticeMN · fracture →
MissouriPure comparative negligence5 years for personal injury; 2 years for medical malpracticeMO · fracture →
LouisianaModified comparative, 51% bar1 year (la prescription), extended to 2 years by Act 423 (2024) for tort claims accruing on or after July 1, 2024LA · fracture →
MassachusettsModified comparative, 51% bar3 years from date of injuryMA · fracture →
MontanaModified comparative, 51% bar3 years from date of injuryMT · fracture →
NevadaModified comparative, 51% bar2 years for personal injury; 3 years for medical malpracticeNV · fracture →
KentuckyPure comparative negligence1 year for personal injury (one of the shortest in the US)KY · fracture →
MaineModified comparative, 50% bar6 years for personal injury, longest in the USME · fracture →
★ IL · fracture · frequently asked

Common questions.

Each answer is independently coherent and references the relevant statute or authority document.

★ editorial note

Figures on this page are not quotes for any specific case. For representation, consult an attorney admitted in Illinois. See /methodology, /sources, and /disclaimer.