Skip to content
MyClaimWorth
DC
District of Columbia · workplace

Workplace settlements
in District of Columbia.

By 6 min read

The District of Columbia applies pure contributory negligence with a narrow statutory exception for cyclists and pedestrians, and a relatively long 3-year statute of limitations. For workplace claims specifically, the band is built from the state-by-state tort law · jury verdict reporters · statutory caps framework and then adjusted for District of Columbia's pure contributory negligence.

District of Columbia retains pure contributory negligence — one of only a handful of US jurisdictions that has not abolished the rule. For workplace claims, this means any percentage of claimant fault, however small, bars recovery entirely. The rule converts mixed-liability workplace cases into binary outcomes and gives defendants and their insurers substantial settlement leverage. Plaintiffs' counsel here typically focus heavily on framing the claimant's conduct as faultless before damages are even discussed.

District of Columbia does not impose a state-specific statutory cap on the standard heads of damage in workplace cases. The band is constrained primarily by jury verdict ranges, insurance policy limits, and the strength of the medical paper trail. Catastrophic workplace claims with documented future care needs can clear the upper end of the band without bumping into a statutory ceiling.

DC · statute of limitations
3 years from date of injury

D.C. Code § 12-301

DC · fault rule
Pure contributory negligence

Pure contributory negligence — 1% claimant fault bars recovery, with a narrow exception for cyclists and pedestrians under D.C. Code § 50-2204.52.

workplace · neighbouring jurisdictions

Compare to neighbours.

How District of Columbia's fault rule and limitation period compare to other US jurisdictions for workplace claims.

JurisdictionFault ruleLimitationWorkplace page
District of Columbia · you are herePure contributory negligence3 years from date of injury
AlabamaPure contributory negligence2 years from date of injuryAL · workplace
AlaskaPure comparative negligence2 years from date of injury or discoveryAK · workplace
ArizonaPure comparative negligence2 years from date of injuryAZ · workplace
ArkansasModified comparative — 50% bar3 years for personal injury; 2 years for medical malpracticeAR · workplace
CaliforniaPure comparative negligence2 years for personal injury; 1 year for medical malpractice (with 3-year repose)CA · workplace
ColoradoModified comparative — 50% bar2 years for personal injury; 3 years for motor vehicleCO · workplace
ConnecticutModified comparative — 51% bar2 years from date of injuryCT · workplace
DelawareModified comparative — 51% bar2 years from date of injuryDE · workplace
FloridaModified comparative — 51% bar2 years from date of injury (was 4; reduced by HB 837)FL · workplace
GeorgiaModified comparative — 50% bar2 years from date of injuryGA · workplace
HawaiiModified comparative — 51% bar2 years from date of injuryHI · workplace
IdahoModified comparative — 50% bar2 years from date of injuryID · workplace
DC · workplace · frequently asked

Common questions.

Each answer is independently coherent and references the relevant statute or authority document.

editorial note

Figures on this page are starting points: the US band adjusted for District of Columbia's statutory framework. They are not quotes for any specific case. For representation, consult an attorney admitted in District of Columbia. See /methodology, /sources, and /disclaimer.