Skip to content
MyClaimWorth
DC
District of Columbia · workplace

Workplace settlements
in District of Columbia.

By 6 min read

The District of Columbia applies pure contributory negligence with a narrow statutory exception for cyclists and pedestrians, and a relatively long 3-year statute of limitations. For workplace claims specifically, the band is built from the state-by-state tort law · jury verdict reporters · statutory caps framework and then adjusted for District of Columbia's pure contributory negligence.

District of Columbia retains pure contributory negligence — one of only a handful of US jurisdictions that has not abolished the rule. For workplace claims, this means any percentage of claimant fault, however small, bars recovery entirely. The rule converts mixed-liability workplace cases into binary outcomes and gives defendants and their insurers substantial settlement leverage. Plaintiffs' counsel here typically focus heavily on framing the claimant's conduct as faultless before damages are even discussed.

District of Columbia does not impose a state-specific statutory cap on the standard heads of damage in workplace cases. The band is constrained primarily by jury verdict ranges, insurance policy limits, and the strength of the medical paper trail. Catastrophic workplace claims with documented future care needs can clear the upper end of the band without bumping into a statutory ceiling.

band · US federal frame
Scheduled statutory benefits — no pain-and-suffering award
Workplace injury (workers compensation)
State workers-compensation schedules; value tracks the impairment rating, the wage rate and future medical, and most claims close by compromise-and-release rather than verdict.

The US band is the starting point. District of Columbia's fault rule and any applicable cap then adjust the figure.

DC · statute of limitations
3 years from date of injury

D.C. Code § 12-301

DC · fault rule
Pure contributory negligence

Pure contributory negligence — 1% claimant fault bars recovery, with a narrow exception for cyclists and pedestrians under D.C. Code § 50-2204.52.

workplace · same region & fault regime

Compare to like jurisdictions.

How District of Columbia's fault rule and limitation period compare to jurisdictions in the same US region and to those running the same fault rule for workplace claims.

JurisdictionFault ruleLimitationWorkplace page
District of Columbia · you are herePure contributory negligence3 years from date of injury
MaineModified comparative — 50% bar6 years for personal injury — longest in the USME · workplace
MarylandPure contributory negligence3 years from date of injuryMD · workplace
MassachusettsModified comparative — 51% bar3 years from date of injuryMA · workplace
New HampshireModified comparative — 51% bar3 years from date of injuryNH · workplace
New JerseyModified comparative — 51% bar2 years from date of injuryNJ · workplace
New YorkPure comparative negligence3 years for personal injury; 2 years 6 months for medical malpracticeNY · workplace
North CarolinaPure contributory negligence3 years from date of injuryNC · workplace
VirginiaPure contributory negligence2 years from date of injuryVA · workplace
AlabamaPure contributory negligence2 years from date of injuryAL · workplace
FloridaModified comparative — 51% bar2 years from date of injury (was 4; reduced by HB 837)FL · workplace
GeorgiaModified comparative — 50% bar2 years from date of injuryGA · workplace
HawaiiModified comparative — 51% bar2 years from date of injuryHI · workplace
DC · workplace · frequently asked

Common questions.

Each answer is independently coherent and references the relevant statute or authority document.

editorial note

Figures on this page are starting points: the US band adjusted for District of Columbia's statutory framework. They are not quotes for any specific case. For representation, consult an attorney admitted in District of Columbia. See /methodology, /sources, and /disclaimer.